Ok asdf, let's just say you were at a conference.  How would you debunk this position set forth by this prof, tearing his arguments and claims apart?  Other than sending your colleagues to a wacko web site, how would you argue against the points that he made?  Just curious as a moderator between his arguments and yours, because you haven't sent forth your own arguments other than opinionated pooh-poohing of the argument in general?  That will not fly at any university, no matter how far out the proposing theory really is.  I'm just curious because the jury is out for me, I'm just looking for a good argument one way or the other.  So far the conspiracist uses some convincing laws of physicsto support his argument and you refer to some tin-foil hat experiment at MIT.

"Schiller sprach zu Goethe, Steck in dem Arsch die Flöte! Goethe sagte zu Schiller, Mein Arsch ist kein Triller!"