The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
I actually commend the way the Jewish people have been able to keep their history alive as a constant reminder, as a narrative we can all use to learn some valuable lessons. So I don't think we should just move along now from their story. No way. From a purely psychological point of view, they have accomplished an amazing service to us all by telling their story over and over, forcing the rest of us to listen to them rather than move along to the next news story, making their plight not just an unfortunate chapter in human history, but crucial to our understanding of ourselves, what we are capable of both at our very worst (genocide) and our very best (survivors). The process they have gone through in trying to heal has, I hope, made us all better people.
So, if I say that my people were also victims & survivors of systematic state-sponsored genocide, that doesn't make the Holocaust any less important.
It's not like we have a quota of sympathy, lessons to learn, history to be told and that the Holocaust leaves no room for the rest. Or that all genocides are bad but the Holocaust is extraspecial bad. They are all equally horrific for those who experience them. And everyone who has been on the receiving end of them deserves our attention, sympathy, and our help to ensure it never happens again.
The Jewish people have been remarkably successfull in getting their story told, no small feat. But there are those whose stories have been relegated to the history books or burried deep in the newspaper. That says more about the people who write our history than the people who've been victims of it.
(Full disclosure: My great grandmother was Cherokee. My boyfriend is Jewish.) Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. -Voltaire
The point about denying genocides, imho, is that (though we may be forgetful, and in some cases countries and peoples may be happy to forget), the principal case where there is an outright, organized effort to deny, or reduce, or relativize, a genocide concerns that of the European Jews. I'm referring to the movement known as "revisionism" or more properly "negationism". The overall tendency of negationism is antisemitic in that it promotes the notion of a Jewish plot to publicize, exaggerate, or (for the extremos) downright fabricate the history of the genocide. Secondly, it's a movement which favours the racist extreme right by inducing a state of confusion in people's minds as to the ultra-right's past crimes, thus disculpating the racist/fascist elements today and encouraging them to be more extremist and have the "courage" of their "convictions".
Europeans may be sensitive to this because we see the emergence of extreme-right parties and groups, of skinheads and neo-Nazis, things we thought we would never see again. And to be sensitive to how the genocide of the Jews is discussed does not imply insensitivity to other genocides and massacres, including those perpetrated by the Nazis on other groups than the Jews.
On the Congo, though the topic was not specifically genocide, here's a comment I made in a diary by Richard Drayton some time back.
by Oui - Dec 5 8 comments
by gmoke - Nov 28
by Oui - Dec 8
by Oui - Dec 617 comments
by Oui - Dec 612 comments
by Oui - Dec 58 comments
by Oui - Dec 41 comment
by Oui - Dec 21 comment
by Oui - Dec 155 comments
by Oui - Dec 16 comments
by gmoke - Nov 303 comments
by Oui - Nov 3012 comments
by Oui - Nov 2838 comments
by Oui - Nov 2713 comments
by Oui - Nov 2511 comments
by Oui - Nov 24
by Oui - Nov 221 comment
by Oui - Nov 22
by Oui - Nov 2119 comments
by Oui - Nov 1615 comments
by Oui - Nov 154 comments