The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
the illegal trade in drugs, arms, intellectual property, people, and money is booming. Like the war on terrorism, the fight to control these illicit markets pits governments against agile, stateless, and resourceful networks empowered by globalization. Governments will continue to lose these wars until they adopt new strategies to deal with a larger, unprecedented struggle that now shapes the world as much as confrontations between nation-states once did.
Consider another viewpoint, though a bit grim one. After the Cold War, all the funding was withdrawn from Afghanistan. The old elite was basically eradicated and new elite appeared - warlords, some of which trading with the US government. Ironically enough, this provides a certain amount of stability in the region. So, governments are probably not fighting the crime, but rather legalizing it (or in Afghanistan's case, the warlords are basically the government, the elites).
Also, Pakistan is quoted to be a Yugoslavia, but with a nuclear "taste". Pakistan is comprised of many ethnicities, each protecting their own kinsmen. Some critics claim that Pakistan exists only for the sake of the Pakistani army and no local tribe actually needs a Pakistani government or it's protection. Be careful! Is it classified?
The old elite was basically eradicated and new elite appeared...
I personally do not think that it is so easy to eradicate the old elite. I do not follow closely the situation in Pakistan, but if you look at the ex-communist regimes, there are implicit evidences that the old structures still exercise an immense amount of political and economic power through their connections, resiliense to the new conditions, and never ending ambitions to stay involved in states' affairs. No one gives up so easily the bone... I'm not ugly,but my beauty is a total creation.Hegel
FWIK, there is a current conflict between the old elite (situated in the country) and the new elite, basically warlords, operating from the cities. Indeed, who wants to give up political and economical power?
The Pashtun, a tribe found in Pakistan and neighboring Afghanistan are foreseen as the new power group in the region. Be careful! Is it classified?
I wouldn't call that stability. After both the Soviets and the CIA pulled out, the warlords first conducted a terrible civil war. That civil war was kind of ended by the Taleban, which conquered most of their territories. Then the US let the warlords back - but they conduct their own fiefdoms, their soldiers are no better for the population than the Taleban (in fact, some Afghanis say, worse: by allowing free reign of common criminals), clash with each other ocassionally - and all the while the Taleban conducts a guerilla campaign, lately with Iraq as the model. *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by gmoke - Nov 28
by gmoke - Nov 12 7 comments
by Oui - Dec 41 comment
by Oui - Dec 2
by Oui - Dec 118 comments
by Oui - Dec 16 comments
by gmoke - Nov 303 comments
by Oui - Nov 3012 comments
by Oui - Nov 2838 comments
by Oui - Nov 2712 comments
by Oui - Nov 2511 comments
by Oui - Nov 24
by Oui - Nov 221 comment
by Oui - Nov 22
by Oui - Nov 2119 comments
by Oui - Nov 1615 comments
by Oui - Nov 154 comments
by Oui - Nov 1319 comments
by Oui - Nov 1224 comments
by gmoke - Nov 127 comments
by Oui - Nov 1114 comments