The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Well, Tibet has been unique cultural centre centuries before Columbus has discovered America?
Yes, but many other areas have been, as well. I have nothing against Tibet, and I'd love for its culture to be preserved, but these are people -- not Smithsonian artifacts.
The heritage doesn't disappear because of McDonald's and Levi's. That's just "rubbish" (practicing my Britishisms ;-). People don't have to buy Levi's jeans or McDonald's Big Macs. I don't know why people shop with those two companies, anyway. The latter is sewage on a bun, and the former is over-priced clothing that falls apart within a year.
Further, I don't understand why it's taken as a given that consumerism cannot be coupled with a maintenance of one's heritage.
Is it fair to ask that the people of Tibet maintain their traditional culture without giving them all of the available choices?
It's just as ridiculous as the claim that Wal-Mart is destroying "small-town America," which brings up images of the pretty, little Main Street stores and the local Methodist church and the harmonious community and all of that other bullshit. (For me, it brings up images of anti-abortion protests, religious nutjobs, segregation, hunters shooting furry woodland creatures, and pseudo-patriotism.) If people stopped shopping at Wal-Mart (or McDonald's or whatever other chain), it wouldn't be an issue.
If the traditional culture of Tibet is held to be so important among its people, it will remain important. But people deserve to make their own choices. Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to your country.
so the "fairness" with which they compete for the dollars of consumers (who may themselves have been impoverished by the foldup of American manufacturing and the rise of monopoly ag) is dubious. yes, it's short sighted of the locals to cooperate in the pithing of their own state and county and town economies; but the poker game is somewhat rigged as well. The difference between theory and practise in practise ...
However, in many cases, Wal-Mart has moved into areas where the manufacturing jobs had already left and the small retailers were not making any money because of the local economy being crippled by the plant moving to China or Mexico.
You'll get no argument from me about the Chinese Communist Party being a brutal regime that promotes slave labor and steals peasants' property. And any group that brags about being the "Heir to Mao" will win no brownie points from me.
But we're just as guilty on that issue, because we're the ones who have promoted trade without promoting worker rights, too. As I said, we shouldn't trade with countries that force children to work and that don't enshrine, for example, the right to organize. (I think "Mall-Wart" -- I love that, by the way; well said -- employees in China recently gained this right by lobbying the managers and the local party official(s), but I may be thinking of another company. Correct me if I'm wrong. If so, at least it's a start, but we need to back them up. If Americans really want the world to love them, as they say they do, they'll start rebuilding their relations by pounding the table on human rights -- starting with China.) Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to your country.
by gmoke - Nov 28
by gmoke - Nov 12 7 comments
by Oui - Dec 18 comments
by Oui - Dec 1
by gmoke - Nov 302 comments
by Oui - Nov 3012 comments
by Oui - Nov 2837 comments
by Oui - Nov 278 comments
by Oui - Nov 2511 comments
by Oui - Nov 24
by Oui - Nov 221 comment
by Oui - Nov 22
by Oui - Nov 2119 comments
by Oui - Nov 1615 comments
by Oui - Nov 154 comments
by Oui - Nov 1319 comments
by Oui - Nov 1224 comments
by gmoke - Nov 127 comments
by Oui - Nov 1114 comments
by Oui - Nov 10
by Oui - Nov 928 comments