The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
To become rich nowadays means to embrace capitalism, and this means embracing notions of consumerism, possession, increased purchasing power, and in particular this means obtaining the possibility to purchase exotic/luxury items. And since one man's local product is another man's exotic/luxurious product, rich Bengladeshis buy vintage Indian cars, rich Indians buy Ferraris, rich Italians buy Rolls Royces ...
So either we stop wanting the third world to emulate our path (so that they can save their culture), or we choose another path, for example the one of degrowth, which I somewhat affect.
God what am I saying? Ok, this was just typed as I thought it.
The rise of global competitors and upcoming energy problems should start pushing us down this other path we haven't yet tested, an alternative to communism and capitalism. Europe could show the way ...
The very least we need to do is to start eating more potatoes and less bananas, like in the good old days.
down this other path we haven't yet tested, an alternative to communism and capitalism. Europe could show the way ...
But remember that, if America collapsed, China (and/or our other lenders) would be left holding useless pieces of paper. Trade creates "inescapable interdependencies," as von Mises -- whom, for the record, I despise -- rightly, I think, referred to it. It's the beauty and, at the same time, the horror of capitalism. A crippled America translates to very bad news in Asia.
At this point in time, America is still, easily, the dominant partner in the relationship. But, if America does not use that dominance to demand a liberalized yuan, both countries will wind up in one hell of a mess in the future. (And I, my friend, will be well-insulated in Europe. ;-) Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to your country.
I would have put this precisely the other way around :-) The difference between theory and practise in practise ...
whereas there are whole clusters of limiting factors to growth, both sources and sinks, and unless we posit star trek technology, energy alone is not sufficient to solve them. but this s/b a separate thread I think... The difference between theory and practise in practise ...
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 2 4 comments
by gmoke - Sep 27
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 17
by Oui - Oct 8
by Oui - Oct 74 comments
by Oui - Oct 67 comments
by Oui - Oct 55 comments
by Oui - Oct 4
by Oui - Oct 41 comment
by Oui - Oct 31 comment
by Oui - Oct 24 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 24 comments
by Oui - Oct 214 comments
by Oui - Oct 121 comments
by Oui - Oct 124 comments
by Oui - Sep 30
by Oui - Sep 303 comments
by Oui - Sep 2819 comments
by Oui - Sep 28
by Oui - Sep 276 comments
by Oui - Sep 271 comment
by Oui - Sep 263 comments