Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
US militarism has gotten out of hand. As has been pointed out above 50% of the discretionary federal budget is devoted to this sector:

http://www.warresisters.org/piechart.htm

There have been other periods in time when the military budget was such a large fraction of the GDP, but these were in times of emergency like WWII. What is new this time is that starting in the 1990's there was no enemy, but the military continued to grow anyway. Threats have been exaggerated or manufactured in order to justify the continuing level of spending. Just yesterday Bush tried to equate the cold war with the "war on terror" as a justification for permanent unchecked spending.

In addition the military/industrial sector has gotten much smarter in the last 50 years. Projects are now spread over many states and congressional districts to insure that legislators have a local interest in keeping projects going.

While all this has been going on other sectors of the society have been allowed to back slide. The poster child being the Katrina preparation and response. Similar failings can be seen in education, the manufacturing sector and civil engineering projects.

I hate to bring up Rome, but the US is starting to look a lot like the end of empire. None of the recent critics of current policies have been able to offer any suggestions on how to turn the ship of state around.

Policies not Politics
---- Daily Landscape

by rdf (robert.feinman@gmail.com) on Tue May 30th, 2006 at 01:14:44 PM EST
There have been other periods in time when the military budget was such a large fraction of the GDP, but these were in times of emergency like WWII.

With all do respect Robert, that is completely wrong. US military spending as a percentage of GDP was higher than current spending, including the Iraq and Afghan wars, for virtually the entire Cold War.  During WWII it was much higher - almost 40% of GDP.

see the data here for the period through FY 2003.

by MarekNYC on Tue May 30th, 2006 at 01:33:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Thank you, Marek.

Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to your country.
by Drew J Jones (pedobear@pennstatefootball.com) on Tue May 30th, 2006 at 08:44:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]
What is new this time is that starting in the 1990's there was no enemy, but the military continued to grow anyway. Threats have been exaggerated or manufactured in order to justify the continuing level of spending.

I'm sorry, Robert.  You may want to believe this, since it jives with your "Crumbling of America" view, but this, too, is demonstrably false, if you follow Marek's link.  As a percentage of GDP, military spending steadily declined during the 1990s.  In fact, it appears to have declined in every year from 1993 to 1998, and then flatlined from 1999 to 2001 at 3% of GDP.  Military spending has not approached 10% of GDP since the late-1960s.  Even Reagan never went above 6.2%.

Even as a percentage of discretionary spending, the military budget fell in every year from 1987 to 2001, and is still not incredibly high by historical standards -- though, in fairness, the numbers I have only go as far as 2003.

Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to your country.

by Drew J Jones (pedobear@pennstatefootball.com) on Tue May 30th, 2006 at 09:16:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series