Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
Payment by Results. No kidding ...

When through hell, just keep going. W. Churchill
by Agnes a Paris on Wed May 3rd, 2006 at 12:00:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]
That makes the hair stand up on the back of my neck ... how's that work exactly?
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Wed May 3rd, 2006 at 12:10:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]
PbR compensates Trusts based on the volume of their activity and mix of health care provision, according to a national tariff system. For a gradually increasing share of their activities, it will gradually replace the old block grant system that was based on historical revenues.
PbR potentially gives Trusts greater revenue flexibility, enabling them to be paid more for additional activity.
Conversely, it could also penalise the Trusts with higher costs than can be remunerated under the national tariff. (The national tariff, which has been calculated by the DoH for these purposes, does allow for minor regional variations and additional compensation for specialist care providers.)


When through hell, just keep going. W. Churchill
by Agnes a Paris on Wed May 3rd, 2006 at 12:21:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Within the details of that there is room for a lot of devils...
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Wed May 3rd, 2006 at 12:23:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Too right!

If I interpret the language correctly (I am a native English speaker, but DoH seems to write in something else) the most obvious potential for devilry is in the tariff-setting.  If it's slightly wrong, some activities will be more profitable than others.  In a PbR system, who's going to want to do the less profitable types of clinical work?

So if you have the 'wrong' type of illness, tough luck!

No idea if there's a mechanism to correct for this.  NuLab's managerial abilities in other fields suggests not.

by GreatGame2 (fishy_logic_at_yahoo.co.uk) on Thu May 4th, 2006 at 06:13:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series