Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
No, I criticised him for quoting a long Israeli government propaganda article (consisting in large part of quotes from articles) in its entirety, and without comment, and all of it above fold, which in other places is considered spamming.

I am critisizing the lack of diversity of opinions on this site.

  1. Given that from messy through you, Marek and a couple of others, there is a continuum of opinions on Israel on this side of 'just critical', there is a diversity of opinions.

  2. If opinions tend to be in one direction, that can not only be due to lack of objectivity. It could be due to making the right conclusion.


*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Fri Aug 4th, 2006 at 04:50:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]
75% of Americans supported the war in Iraq. Is it because there was a lack of objectivity or because they made the right conclusion? :)

Mikhail from SF
by Tsarrio (dj_tsar@yahoo.com) on Fri Aug 4th, 2006 at 07:28:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]
99% of ET readers were against the Iraq War. Is this because of lack of objectivity, or because this is a sample of people more informed and/or of better judgement than Americans asked by pollsters?

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Sat Aug 5th, 2006 at 07:15:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I can understand why they did. It was the right conclusion to make given the circumstances.

Nothing is 'mere'. — Richard P. Feynman
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sat Aug 5th, 2006 at 07:30:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series