Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Thanks for this diary, Nnadir.

A few observations:

Chernobyl was a stupid and entirely avoidable incident.  The reactor was not located in a containment building.  That's the reason cesium and radio-iodine got dispersed.  The Three Mile Island reactor that had a partial meltdown had a containment building, so no cesium escaped.  

Twenty years later the death toll stands at 60, with 51 of the victims having died either because of the steam explosion or because of being exposed to extremely high levels of radiation while working to mitigate the accident.  The remaining 9 have died of thyroid cancer from radio-iodine.  If they had received potassium iodide promptly their thyroids never would have taken up the I-131.  If they had received good medical care they would not have died of thyroid cancer, which is a highly treatable malignancy.

The background radiation of the Chernobyl area is naturally low due to an absence of uranium in the soil.  The accident brought the radiation level in the Exclusion Zone to that of parts of Spain and France.  If you were evacuated from the contaminated Exclusion Zone and moved to Finland or the Colorado Plateau you would have increased your exposure to radiation.

Villagers around Chernobyl continued living in mildly contaminated areas.  The rate of death and disease for them is as it was prior to the accident.  For 40 years cancer rates have been steadily rising in E. Europe and are continuing to rise at the same rate.

The biggest public health problem for Chernobyl is the same as the one for Katrina:  diseases and disorders associated with post traumatic stress syndrome in populations that have been suddenly uprooted and have had to live with meager health care and poor nutrition.  Smoking, alcohol and drug abuse, spousal and child abuse are all up.  As with Katrina, this aftermath was preventable.  

Humans evolved in Africa, which has areas that are naturally high in radiation.  Some of the richest uranium is found in Africa. In fact, natural reactors occurred there 1.8 billion years ago. The body knows how to cope with higher levels of radiation than we receive today.  Low-level radiation stimulates the DNA repair mechanisms.

by Plan9 on Wed Jan 31st, 2007 at 12:24:09 PM EST
In case you missed it, you should read this.

Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. -Voltaire
by p------- on Wed Jan 31st, 2007 at 12:44:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]
scientific literature is a lie because it doesn't agree with the Greenpeace Party line.

Everybody who has an agenda likes to deny the scientific results.   Exxon-Mobile does it and so does Greenpeace.   Both are distorting reality.

The UNSCEAR report is available on line and has many thousands of references - almost all of them from reputable scientific journals around the world.

The Greenpeace argument about Chernobyl is anecdotal, poorly supported and frankly, if not exploitive, silly.  It is well represented by the diary you link, which is spectacular only for its rhetoric and poor comprehension of the issues.   Basically it is an attempt to substitute a conspiracy theory for a body of widely collected data.

I could post a picture of an amputee and claim he was injured in a coal mine collapse or an oil refinery explosion.  

I could post heart rending pictures of children wallowing in coal dust, or fleeing droughts that may be related to climate change.   However, I won't.  I will continue to write just as I have.

by NNadir on Thu Feb 1st, 2007 at 10:42:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I'm sorry to hear you feel that way.  DoDo and DeAnander are 2 of our best front page contributors.  They are certainly not shills for Greenpeace, interested in exploiting anyone or promoting unfounded "conspiracy" theories.

I have not suggested you should not "write as you have." I simply wanted to show something to a commenter.  I'm glad you took the time to read it as well, and I hope you continue to contribute.  In the future I hope you can read DoDo's and De's work with a more open mind, or at least critique it without resorting to the same "rhetoric" you ostensibly have no patience for...

Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. -Voltaire

by p------- on Thu Feb 1st, 2007 at 12:36:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]
In the diary linked by poemless, I wrote a 2676-word review of a 76-page review by two NGOs (neither of which was Greenpeace) of mostly published scientific research on Chernobyl. You respond by six paragraphs of pure rhetoric (as bad as you accuse Greenpeace of, as poemless sez) that is also a total non-sequitur.

After this, it should surprise no one that I don't bother to comment your diaries.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Thu Feb 1st, 2007 at 12:55:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]


Occasional Series