Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
Just to be contrarian..why do we need more nukes at all? Is it really the best way to go?

"Once in awhile we get shown the light, in the strangest of places, if we look at it right" - Hunter/Garcia
by whataboutbob on Mon Mar 26th, 2007 at 05:00:35 AM EST
I am not sure we do.

The question is deliberately asked about how many should exist, thereby giving you the option of giving answers that effectively means taking nuclear plants off-line. Including total scrapping of nuclear power. If you are fine with todays level but do not want more reactors then 400-500 would be your range.

I am mostly curious of what the various pro-/anti- stances means in terms of amount of nuclear power, right now measured in reactors.

Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se

by A swedish kind of death on Mon Mar 26th, 2007 at 05:34:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series