Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
Even if a "new energy cavalry" would exist (defying the current understanding of thermodynamics), the overhaul from the oil-based to a new infractructure would be just stupendous - how many engines and cars would have to be replaced, how many gas stations discarded? Who will the suffer costs of the overhaul? Gosh, do we have realistically enough aluminium (or whatever material) to run billions of cars? Maybe we would be just better off sucking oil still.

Besides, is it comfortable to be so dependent on a team of lucky inventors?

Praying for a technological breakthrough just in time is like expecting salvation from a higher power in the face of Rapture - the modern "rational" faith is no different from old Christian myths, after all.

by das monde on Mon May 21st, 2007 at 04:31:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]
the overhaul from the oil-based to a new infractructure would be just stupendous - how many engines and cars would have to be replaced, how many gas stations discarded? Who will the suffer costs of the overhaul?

That is why I think the only realistic way forward is synthetic hydrocarbons from renewable electricity. Synthetic hydrocarbons are carbon-neutral, too.

Bush is a symptom, not the disease.

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Mon May 21st, 2007 at 05:04:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Will we have enough renewable electivity for all synthetic hydrocarbons we "need"? The tempo of renewability is limited.
by das monde on Tue May 22nd, 2007 at 03:49:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Ah, but at least we can piggyback on the existing transport infrastructure.

Bush is a symptom, not the disease.
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 22nd, 2007 at 05:28:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series