Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
Retail banking may be a profitable activity, but it's not profitable for the bankers involved. The only way bankers become "masters of the universe" is when banks get fees on multibillion euro deals and the investment bankers that do these deals claim fractions of that income for having "originated", "structured" and "closed" the deal. Without that important factoid that investment banking income in big, discrete, relatively rare amounts and not from lots of small transactions, you don't get the whole phenomenon of income capture, income concentration and all the instruments built on top of it.

Retail banking may not be seen as a very nice industry, but it's not the one creating the Anglo Disease.

And landing to relatively small organic farming activities will be retail, almost by definition - given how important local conditions are meant to be.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Sun Jul 15th, 2007 at 04:33:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Are you saying the banks don't profit from the interest of their small loans?

Can the last politician to go out the revolving door please turn the lights off?
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Jul 15th, 2007 at 04:37:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]
but not investment bankers.

What makes investment banking so unusual as an industry is that it is the "workers" (i.e. the investment bankers above a certain pay grade/ in certain jobs) that capture most of the income. A very small number of people get a massive benefit from a system whereby other companies are rules for financial profit and engage in large financial transactions (mergers and acquisitions, structured financing, securitization of future cahs flows, etc...) from which they can capture a big chunk of the income generated/captured.

This is the easiest way to get very rich very quickly (the other way is to be a high level manager of a big company, essentially the mirror image of the other - in effect the two sides collude to capture money from the company's future via financial engineering). And this is what drives the financiarisation of business - massive personal interest.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Sun Jul 15th, 2007 at 05:20:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Banks do but not investment bankers

Yes, I figured that's what you meant.

Now, will these retail banks be retail operations themselves, or will the profit generated by the bank be captured by the high-level managers of big banks?

Can the last politician to go out the revolving door please turn the lights off?

by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Jul 15th, 2007 at 05:25:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]
but if it's the only industry where that happens, it's a lot easier to deal with. Banking is a heavily regulated industry, as it should, and the example of the 30s (the Glass-Seagall Act) shows that you can limit the worst excesses.

The thing is to limit the influence of investment banking on other industries, and one way to do that is maybe to take a harder look at mergers and acquisitions.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Sun Jul 15th, 2007 at 05:43:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series