Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
Certainly a new way to look at things..

It is really a good way to put it metaphorically.. ont he ground everything is so complex that I do nto know if those circuits can ever be somehow "shown"... but I guess the whole point is interpretation...

Where would you put the narrative universal.. the need to understand histories?

Since it is universal it should nto go to the rational.. but the bio and anal do nto encompass ratioanlization.

How do you fit that narrative is an universal theme..?it would mean that the smeantic circuit is more important that what you suggest..science would be just a way to implement it...but thes emantic cicuit will be much more important and it will be very common to everybody..e xcept that a prticualr rationalization like scicne will not reach more than 50% of the population.

From the top of my hat...

A pleasure

I therefore claim to show, not how men think in myths, but how myths operate in men's minds without their being aware of the fact. Levi-Strauss, Claude

by kcurie on Mon Jul 23rd, 2007 at 04:01:08 PM EST

Others have rated this comment as follows:

Display:

Occasional Series