The problem is that none of these will make a difference if the motivation behind them remains exploitative.

Which is why the requirement is for a framework within which it is to my advantage to cooperate with you/ work WITH you rather than to compete with you/ work FOR you, because we are "both on the same side".

That's what an "Open" Corporate like the UK LLP and its (non-Corporate) US relative, the LLC,  enables, and why the structures I advocate are emerging.

Because they WORK.

They do so by bringing the different stakeholders together "inside the box" rather than leaving them as "costs" to be exploited outside it.

A non-hierarchical "Corporation" is still a Corporation, and it suffers from the fundamental faultline of all Corporations - whether or not "For Profit" - between the interests of the "Principal" Owner, and the "Agent" ie the management, whether they structure themselves hierarchically or not.

Production/revenue sharing between Capital provider/ Investor and user of Capital changes all that. It brings them on to the same side, takes the motivation of "self interest" and turns it around so that our self interest is actually served better by working WITH each other openly, transparently and cooperatively.

"The future is already here -- it's just not very evenly distributed" William Gibson