No, it doesn't. yet again you seem to think that while others aren't allowed to have opinions not supported by scientific research, you can have any old opinion you want and don't have to justify it all. Where is YOUR evidence that shows he is wrong - in what was clearly just a personal speculation - very well received by a group with experience of religious indoctrination - and in some cases, directly or indirectly, sexual abuse - which can take many forms.

I've already asked you not to adopt the patronising attitude that if I defend Dawkins and criticise you it's because I'm taking things personally - not at all. I just hate unfair criticism of anybody, especially from people who don't offer evidence or sound arguments.

Maybe it's because I'm a Londoner - that I moved to Nice.