The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
But all of these entities, it is obviously why they need to know your address - so you can get your mail, have electricity, etc. And registering to vote is I guess de facto registering with the government, but it is not required. If you want to work a decent job, you are required to fill out tax forms, so again, the gov't knows where you live. Are they just streamlining things? Can they say "No. You can't live here."? "Pretending that you already know the answer when you don't is not actually very helpful." ~Migeru.
Can they say "No. You can't live here."?
No, not if you are a Swiss citizen or have B permit (sort of a green card).
So your answer really is "Yes." :) "Pretending that you already know the answer when you don't is not actually very helpful." ~Migeru.
I used to see it as big brother too, but after what happened during the last two US elections i do not consider it so bad anymore. I mean the US has become a big brother state without any central citizen registration.
It may vary state by state, but we don't have to declare a party here. In primaries, you have to pick one at some point, but that is for obvious reasons.
The whole voter purging stuff is very very very very rare, and has much more to do with the equipment or corruption. Probably because of 2000, you think that is how it is, but for the VAST MAJORITY of Americans, you register, you get a card and a letter telling you where to vote, and you go vote. Most Americans who have trouble voting are either non-English speaking or new voters unfamiliar with the process. Florida wasn't stolen because of people being unable to vote, but because of stealing an election. I don't see how your system prevents that, given that it is even less transparent than ours.
Really - I think your registering with your government is basically the same thing as registering to vote, the registering is just done differently. "Pretending that you already know the answer when you don't is not actually very helpful." ~Migeru.
I don't see how your system prevents that, given that it is even less transparent than ours.
How is our system less transparent?
Alas, they introduced machine-voting in some constituencies for no good reason, it appears; there have been no reports of consistent vote-flipping in one direction so far. These days it has been tried before the Federal Constitutional Court. The case centres on the lack of transparency, visibility, participation; it is not without merits nor chances.
That's because Illinois has open primaries.
for the VAST MAJORITY of Americans, you register, you get a card and a letter telling you where to vote, and you go vote.
Not including in "the vast majority" are the following states where if you haven't declares a party affiliation you don't get to vote in the primary:
States, commonwealths, districts, and territories that have closed primaries[citation needed]: Arizona California (Republican closed, Democratic semi-closed) Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida [1] Kentucky Maryland Massachusetts (Semi-closed primary) Nebraska New Mexico New York North Carolina (Semi-closed primary) Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Puerto Rico Rhode Island (Semi-closed primary)[2] South Dakota Utah West Virginia
Care to expand on that? A vivid image of what should exist acts as a surrogate for reality. Pursuit of the image then prevents pursuit of the reality -- John K. Galbraith
As for the last part, I say that based on what Fran has told me. Here, there are private citizens present at every step of the election.
Anyway, my aim is not to say one system is better than another, but to let you know how ours works at the micro level, and maybe why we decided to do it like we do. It's a DEEPLY FLAWED system we have, but I think for different reasons you think it is. I think it should be standardized, the same in every state, in every precinct. And I think it's obviously open to corruption. But I also think there are really wonderful aspect of it.
I mean, I did title this diary "Hell is Democracy".
:) "Pretending that you already know the answer when you don't is not actually very helpful." ~Migeru.
In Italy (and, I think Switzerland?) the police even visit you apartment, to make sure that it is big enough for the number of people who are supposed to be staying there.
For the local administration the register of residents is mainly important because German communes get money per inhabitant. Thus there was recently a place in North-Rhine-Westphalia where one did not de-register the local dead. ;-) At a time when the crime of procuration had been abolished in Germany I recall seeing a Swiss policeman on TV checking the bedding for proof that it had been warmed by two.
German communes get money per inhabitant.
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 2 3 comments
by gmoke - Sep 27
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 17
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 10 3 comments
by Oui - Oct 66 comments
by Oui - Oct 54 comments
by Oui - Oct 4
by Oui - Oct 41 comment
by Oui - Oct 31 comment
by Oui - Oct 24 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 23 comments
by Oui - Oct 214 comments
by Oui - Oct 118 comments
by Oui - Oct 124 comments
by Oui - Sep 30
by Oui - Sep 303 comments
by Oui - Sep 2819 comments
by Oui - Sep 28
by Oui - Sep 276 comments
by Oui - Sep 271 comment
by Oui - Sep 263 comments
by Oui - Sep 266 comments
by Oui - Sep 251 comment