The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
In the 80ies Sweden had next to no unemployment while featuring very high levels of benefits for unemployment or illness.
In the 90ies Sweden took the low-inflation, high-unemployment route and installed an independent central bank that believes so firmly in the theorem of keeping the unemployment above the non-acceleratng inflation rate of unemployment, that it increases the rent even if it is external factors driving the inflation. And of course this was followed by cutting back on benefits for unemployment or illness. And after that followed the classical moral underclass discourse to explain that the poor has no money beacuse they are lazy.
So in conclusion: Sweden had no unemployment but high benefits, got unemployment, cut back on benefits, blamed the unemployed. And also, do not trust economics professors. Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se
So I wouldn't heap too much praise on the Swedish economic policies of the 80's. No praise at all really.
It's like saying that US economic policies have been great for the last ten years. Unemnployment was pretty low, everyone got to buy these nice houses, big plasma TV's and even bigger cars.
And then we got this unfortunate crash which had nothing whatsoever to do with the previous policies... </snark> Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
Possible, but irrelevant. If good benefits would cause high unemployment or low participation in the labor market, it should do so irrelevant of credit deregulations, no? Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se
The low unemployment was artificial - we payed for that with high unemployment later during the 90's crisis. Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
The low unemployment was artificial - we payed for that with high unemployment later during the 90's crisis.
Now you are loosing me. It appears a step is missing in your argumentation.
So the low unemployment was artificial, but people also wanted to work - despite generous benefits - because ...? Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se
On one hand about incentives to work, an on the other about the Swedish crash 15 years ago, and the runup to it. Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
Then we can continue the discussion about incentives and stuff. :) Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
I understand that you are arguing that the pre-crash conditions caused the crashed, and well, that much is obvious. Still the 80ies combination of low unemployment, good benefits existed. So I am trying to understand how you relate those conditions to your theory. Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se
If you pay people a lot not to work, they won't work.
people would have stayed home and enjoyed their benefits in the 80ies. Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se
The important thing is the difference between working and not working.
And then you have the moral protestant thing. People who work detest paying for people who can work but won't. They have no trouble supporting people who can't work (sick etc) or people who are trying to find new jobs. In this way a basic state funded wage starts undermining the credibility of the ordinary welfare state in the mind of the voters.
While you have the right to be supported, you also have the duty to contribute and not be a burden, as much as you can. Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
A central bank that focuses on creating unemployment to fight inflation is a bad economic idea no matter what previous economic mess was used to get it put into place. I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
by gmoke - Oct 1
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 24 3 comments
by Oui - Sep 19 19 comments
by Oui - Sep 13 36 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 11 5 comments
by Cat - Sep 13 9 comments
by gmoke - Oct 4
by Oui - Sep 3025 comments
by Oui - Sep 29
by Oui - Sep 285 comments
by Oui - Sep 2717 comments
by Oui - Sep 2620 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 243 comments
by Oui - Sep 1919 comments
by gmoke - Sep 173 comments
by Oui - Sep 153 comments
by Oui - Sep 15
by Oui - Sep 1411 comments
by Oui - Sep 1336 comments
by Cat - Sep 139 comments
by Oui - Sep 1210 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 115 comments
by Oui - Sep 929 comments
by Oui - Sep 713 comments
by Oui - Sep 61 comment