Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
I don't really see what you are getting at?

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
by Starvid on Wed Oct 8th, 2008 at 12:45:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]
If, as you claim

If you pay people a lot not to work, they won't work.

people would have stayed home and enjoyed their benefits in the 80ies.

Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se

by A swedish kind of death on Wed Oct 8th, 2008 at 12:54:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]
At the time the economy was overheated and we had wage inflation IIRC, so the incentives to work were large, in spite of a very generous system that payed people not to work.

The important thing is the difference between working and not working.

And then you have the moral protestant thing. People who work detest paying for people who can work but won't. They have no trouble supporting people who can't work (sick etc) or people who are trying to find new jobs. In this way a basic state funded wage starts undermining the credibility of the ordinary welfare state in the mind of the voters.

While you have the right to be supported, you also have the duty to contribute and not be a burden, as much as you can.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.

by Starvid on Wed Oct 8th, 2008 at 05:02:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series