The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Indeed, flipping on LHC has somewhat higher risk. Yet it remains very, very marginal. And Peak Oil + Credit Crunch have us doomed anyway, so don't worry, be happy. Pierre
A butterfly's wingbeat's-worth of GHG that tips the Global Warming balance and precipitates us all into burning hell? The sudden opening of a human-race-inhaling wormhole to the back end of the Galaxy Where No One Wants To Live? Or just the standard complaints about people who eat beans?
</snark>
Yes, I know I'm that predictable. Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
That is, if you really want to make a moral separation of the two.
Just to clear things up, I didn't ask because I am fretting about it, but because I wanted to know whether or not the theoretical risk existed, or whether it was just urban myth. By 'theoretical', I mean a non-zero risk consistent with current theoretical understanding.
And you say yes, there is. So that clears that up, I think.
by gmoke - Jun 6
by Oui - Jun 158 comments
by Oui - Jun 14
by Oui - Jun 13
by Oui - Jun 12
by Oui - Jun 11
by Oui - Jun 104 comments
by Oui - Jun 101 comment
by Oui - Jun 99 comments
by Oui - Jun 93 comments
by Oui - Jun 86 comments
by Oui - Jun 717 comments
by Oui - Jun 62 comments
by Oui - Jun 58 comments
by Oui - Jun 421 comments