The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
The 'classical' radius is
Although all that really tells you is that you can't say how big an electron is, because unlike a rock it doesn't have hard edges. Instead it's defined by how much it bounces when you bang it with something else.
Curiously, football pitches also seem to suffer from quantum indeterminacy - very bad news for science journalists.
The official FIFA dimensions are '90-120m' wide and '45-90m' tall. Goal dimensions are defined as 7.32m x 2.44m, which presmably requires precision laser range-finding to make sure they're accurate to the nearest mm.
So - it's unlikely we'll ever know exactly how many electrons fit into a football pitch.
A bit unfortunate, that, but there it is.
However at LHC protons are used not electrons. Protons have a diameter of about 10^(-15)m. Of course not the protons, but the quarks and at LHC even mainly the gluons are colliding.
For the non-experts, the following picture is an illustration of a proton by the Oxford Hera group's website.
The dots are quarks. In a proton quarks minus antiquarks net 3 quarks. The springs represent gluons. The lower energy you count the more gluons are there. These are the "force particles" of the strong interaction, which holds as well nuclei together, and have the interesting property that they carry as well strong charge.
The best known "force particle" is the photon, which is the carrier of the electromagnetic interaction. Others are gravitons (not yet directly observed, but who doubts they exist), and the W (Z) bosons, the carrier of the weak interaction, which are the only force particles known which have mass. Der Amerikaner ist die Orchidee unter den MenschenVolker Pispers
Then again, the "radius" of a wavefunction, be it the electron orbital in an atom or the wf of a quark in the proton, is only meaningful as an order of magnitude anyway. We have met the enemy, and he is us — Pogo
But more important you have a typo "but a quark is a composite particle containing three quarks", should be proton is a composite particle... Der Amerikaner ist die Orchidee unter den MenschenVolker Pispers
I suppose I could find it in the particle data booklet, but can you outline the experiment that tests the electron radius? We have met the enemy, and he is us — Pogo
I don't know what measurement exactly provides the best measurement, could be a precision measurement of the B sector or whatever, but that's it pretty much. Der Amerikaner ist die Orchidee unter den MenschenVolker Pispers
The classical radius of the electron is the radius of a sphere such as the energy of the electric field outside it matches the observed rest mass of the electron. If you assume a "classical" electron is truly pointlike you get an infinite energy for its electric field.
The funny thing about quantum field theory is that, since the electron is pointlike (see first paragraph) you need to "renormalize" the self-interaction of the electron (i.e., the interaction of the electron with its own electric field) and renormalization methods involve a "cutoff" (effectively, a mass or a radius cutoff - see second paragraph). You then ger "running coupling coefficients" which means that the "bare mass" and the "bare charge" of the electron vary with the "cutoff". We have met the enemy, and he is us — Pogo
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 24 2 comments
by Oui - Sep 19 19 comments
by Oui - Sep 13 35 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 11 5 comments
by Cat - Sep 13 9 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 2 2 comments
by Oui - Sep 3017 comments
by Oui - Sep 29
by Oui - Sep 28
by Oui - Sep 279 comments
by Oui - Sep 2618 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 242 comments
by Oui - Sep 1919 comments
by gmoke - Sep 173 comments
by Oui - Sep 153 comments
by Oui - Sep 15
by Oui - Sep 1411 comments
by Oui - Sep 1335 comments
by Cat - Sep 139 comments
by Oui - Sep 127 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 115 comments
by Oui - Sep 929 comments
by Oui - Sep 713 comments
by Oui - Sep 61 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 22 comments
by gmoke - Sep 2