Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
Was the Lisbon agenda not more about improving the competitiveness of the EU relative to the rest of the world?  Should the scorecard not therefor compare the EU with other external competitors - US/China?India/Russia etc.?  I appreciate this does not attempt to be a full measure of development - unlike the Human Development Index - but how measurable where the s called Lisbon agenda items in any case?

"It's a mystery to me - the game commences, For the usual fee - plus expenses, Confidential information - it's in my diary..."
by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot male dotty communists) on Fri Mar 14th, 2008 at 01:41:01 PM EST
Should the scorecard not therefor compare the EU with other external competitors - US/China?India/Russia etc.?

There's a bit of info in the pamphlet but not a lot; I too had expected a more comprehensive and comparative scorecard but the CER devoted their report on comparing the member states' overall progress and "failings" over a two year period, i.e., 2006-2007.

That said, I found the report rather comprehensive and easy to read; includes a number of recommendations too in areas/sectors where the CER felt member-states were lagging. Overall, it gives a pretty good eyeview for those who are interested in keeping pace with what's going on in the EU

by The3rdColumn on Fri Mar 14th, 2008 at 04:06:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Top Diaries

Occasional Series