The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
It's interesting in how the left are much less successful at creating the narratives on their terms than the right. If we constructed similarly contradictory narratives, the right would pick it all apart immediately, taking their audience with them. yet when the left try to remind of the lies and false statements/hypocritical actions of the right, somehow we are not so successful in opening eyes to that.
Is that because we are contradicting a deeply ingrained and widely accepted narrative that isn't questioned by people? We are challenging a 'truth' therefore we must be lying and the right can smack us down for it because they still hold the dominant discourse and quickly bury our objections and statements. And the audience remembers how the left contradicted the comfortable and reasonable sounding mainstream story, but they never remember the left pointing out continued lies of the right.
As Bit would say... Bbuy media!.. and as Chris would say... create new structure!!!
A pleasure I therefore claim to show, not how men think in myths, but how myths operate in men's minds without their being aware of the fact. Levi-Strauss, Claude
That's because "the left" actually believes in the enlightenment narrative of facts and consistency.
First of all, there's this idea that the facts are the narrative. Then the idea that creating narrative is lying, and then an expectation that the narratives will be true, which makes the allegiance of the base vulnerable to "consistency" and "honesty" attack from the right.
"The right", on the other hand (see Altemeyer's "The Authoritarians" for evidence at least within the Western™ cultural matrix - kcurie is not convinced it is a cross-cultural universal) doesn't have a problem holding contradictory ideas in their head (at different times, that is), doesn't have qualms about building narratives, and the base doesn't expect consistency or intellectual honesty from their leadership (they have other values) so their allegiance is not vulnerable to consistency attacks. When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
then feel free to forward anything to Escolar... although a tranalated version is time consuming for sure.
but a translation can be given to escolar, that's for sure. Migeru knows the mail... so he can feel free to pass it...
First of all, there's this idea that the facts are the narrative.
Well, the idea that all you have to do is explain facts to people and they'll work out the narrative for themselves.
Narratives are always moral, in the sense of promoting certain kinds of behaviour and discouraging others. But where the Left attacks very specific behaviours, the Right works by promoting feelings first and then adding a narrative wrapper around them.
It's literally Pavlovian conditioning. Make people scared about their jobs and tell them immigrants are coming to take them from them, and in no time you'll have people who hate immigrants.
It's like I said yesterday about 'show don't tell.' It's not just the bedrock of fiction, it's the bedrock of all story-telling, which makes it the bedrock of all politics and economics too.
The mistake the Left makes is putting the feelings last. That's why most campaigns are so ineffective - campaigners feel the outrage, but it's rarely communicated in a way that people who aren't already persuaded can get personally excited about.
There are no such things as free-standing facts with relevance independent of systems of cause and effect.
A certain number of people will be able to build those kinds of systems for themselves that are sufficiently close to coherent that the facts they already "knew" suddenly snap into a new focus.
But that is not enough to bring enough people along quickly enough to build a change coalition. Its not enough to make the raw materials available to people for them to build those systems on a do it yourself basis ... we've also got to provide modular kits and pre-assembled models. I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
The enlightenment project was always an affair of the middle class. It was most influential at those times when this class composed the majority of the electorate. As the franchise was extended to those lower down the ladder the enlightenment narrative became less compelling. In the USA Freemasons served to convey many of these values to emerging members of the middle class. However the majority of the population retained allegiance to "that old time religion." One of the reasons emerging members of the middle class found enlightenment values so attractive was that gave them a perspective on religion that enabled them to develop a relatively integrated, rational faculty, which is useful in business and public affairs--until the adherents of "that old time religion" figure it out and react.
It was elites who proclaimed in the famous 1960s issue of Time Magazine that "God Is Dead." The right seized on this and rode the backlash into dominance in the 1980s. What left there remains in the USA has been swimming against this "dark ages" undertow every since. "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
The most natural state is mutual feedback. An understanding of how this works is essential to modern politics, IMO. The aim would be to build a totally organic, dynamic system. It is not so fanciful as you might imagine. What we are doing at ET is examining the rules for such a future system. You can't be me, I'm taken
It's always worth to point out that this has not always been that way. Currently, the Right is rolling back progress - progress earlier Leftists managed to achieve not without resistance from the then Right. *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.
Preview is your friend. When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
Mission accomplished.
I don't think anyone on the Left was expecting the ferocity of the counter-attack. It's taken a couple of decades just to come to terms with the fact that it happened at all, never mind what to do about it.
I partly blame the academics and the intellectuals we've had for the last couple of decades. Instead of making Thatcherism and Reaganism look juvenile and ridiculous they've mostly been more interested in playing intellectual games like deconstruction, apparently with the delusional belief that this is somehow profoundly influential, rather than spectacularly irrelevant.
Which is why the Left has lost the universities. There's a bit of token claptrap Culture Theory on many media courses in the UK, but in terms of political influence - forgedaboutit.
Right wing faculty positions weren't common, except possibly in science and engineering, and there they were never talked about in class.
The London School of Economics used to be a bastion of the far left. That was partly because of radical student action towards the end of the sixties, but partly because the culture was already pre-existing from the 30s onwards, and being an intellectual meant you were almost certainly a communist or communist sympathiser.
From the start of the 90s MBA culture started to erode that, and now it's becoming formulaic and marginalised, and is being replaced with a much more small-minded and pinched entrepreneurial spirit.
This has done so much damage to universities that the current meme is - why bother? You'll get a better paid job more quickly with vocational experience.
Which is quite true. But there's no longer much sense of going to university to learn, or question, or challenge - it's strictly about finding yourself a shelf on the job market in the hope that someone rich and important notices you.
As you said, they thought fact contained the narrative...most accademics at that time would have failed to explain any story-telling coherently...
they've mostly been more interested in playing intellectual games like deconstruction, apparently with the delusional belief that this is somehow profoundly influential, rather than spectacularly irrelevant.
and the right is going to seize advances in neuroscience for its narratives (We are greedy killing machines, therefore, we must legislate this and codify it culturally) while the left ignores what is happening by clinging to its obsolete century old theories.
you are the media you consume.
the number of false theories about how the brain works is astonishing... the number of DNA nonsense you can read in the major newspapers is amazing...
And there is noone out there fighting back..why brain plasticity suddenly dissappeared from major media? why the fact that DNA cannt code anything relevant int he brain because it doe snot ahve aenoug information never expained? because most of the scientists either beleive the interpretation crap or just do not know what it is hitting them.
Too cool, too easy, too short-lived.
A good friend in those days never stopped telling me that the backlash was going to be terrible.
The left declared victory and left...because things were self-evident.
But I think the worm is turning with the rise of the internet and particularly with the rise of forums such as this one. The Republican party which strutted and talked confidently of an enduring majority just a few short years ago is now in full panic mode. Even their loudest cheerleaders see only dark clouds on the horizon. They no longer control the narrative to the extent they did even five years ago. Looks a little like the internet platypi are eating their corporate media dinosaur eggs and they don't know what to do about it. The blurker formerly known as ignorant bystander.
by Frank Schnittger - May 31
by Oui - May 30 22 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 23 3 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 27 3 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 5 22 comments
by Oui - May 13 66 comments
by Oui - Jun 21 comment
by Oui - Jun 17 comments
by Oui - May 3129 comments
by Oui - May 3022 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 273 comments
by Oui - May 2726 comments
by Oui - May 24
by Frank Schnittger - May 233 comments
by Oui - May 1366 comments
by Oui - May 910 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 522 comments
by Oui - May 450 comments
by Oui - May 312 comments
by Oui - Apr 30273 comments
by Oui - Apr 2647 comments
by Oui - Apr 889 comments
by Oui - Mar 19144 comments