The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
(Debussy & Stravinsky are about as liberated as I get...)
So--the most naturally dissonant intervals--where the frequencies are all clashing (and this can be effected by pitch, too--so that two notes played far apart on the keyboard have different vibrational relationships, and if you swap notes over you get different effects (e.g. play a low A and a high C, then play a low C and a high A)--would not be called ugly--(but I might hear them as ugly because the lack of resolution would disturb my ears, say)--it would be called "sound"--and "organised sound" is one way of starting to think about defining music (etc!)
Schoenberg is famous for developing the twelve tone series, where each of the twelve semitones in a standard western octave are played in succession, no repetitions of notes until the series (all twelve notes) has been played.
Schoenberg is okay (I'm at work so I can't go searching); Webern is the name I would most associate with "most or all intervals pretty ugly".
I'll tell you my theory; but have a listen, it's certainly music that is attempting to do specific things--maybe post up what you found?
So: serialism, twelve tone, Schoenberg, Webern, Cage...
More narrowly still, the term is used to describe music that is neither tonal nor serial, especially the pre-twelve-tone music of the Second Viennese School, principally Alban Berg, Arnold Schoenberg, and Anton Webern.
Composers such as Alexander Scriabin, Béla Bartók, Paul Hindemith, Sergei Prokofiev, Igor Stravinsky, Edgard Varèse, however, have written music that has been described, in full or in part, as atonal.
(As I wrote, for me Stravinsky and Debussy are both everything tonal and most things beyond, whereas some of the other names never did anything tonal--or very little.)
Right, my theory: you see, the a-tonal serialism was (let's say) developed before, during, and after WWI--so there was a technical element (developing Debussy et al's developments, natural movements in the western musical tradition); but I think there was also a moral element--
--well, my theory is that with serialism etc they (in their own words) wished to pare music back to its bare bones, lose all the superfluous sounds--
--but as you wrote above, the harmonics are already creating definite patterns within a single note--specific resonances, so (for me) music that refuses to enter tonality (there are rules about how many major intervals you can have together etc...so it's not just "choose, mix and match"--there's an element of "you must not be tuneful")--
Anyways, Webern--and Berg; I have a friend who enjoys Berg, can't tell you which pieces--a piano concerto? I'll find out this evening, let you know.
Don't fight forces, use them R. Buckminster Fuller.
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 1 5 comments
by Oui - Jul 31
by ATinNM - Jul 13 29 comments
by ATinNM - Jul 15 8 comments
by Oui - Jul 24 30 comments
by Oui - Jul 18 37 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 16 5 comments
by IdiotSavant - Jul 15 5 comments
by gmoke - Aug 3
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 15 comments
by Oui - Jul 31
by Oui - Jul 2430 comments
by Oui - Jul 202 comments
by Oui - Jul 1837 comments
by Oui - Jul 184 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 165 comments
by ATinNM - Jul 158 comments
by IdiotSavant - Jul 155 comments
by IdiotSavant - Jul 141 comment
by ATinNM - Jul 1329 comments
by Oui - Jul 1315 comments
by Oui - Jul 1228 comments
by Oui - Jul 11
by Oui - Jul 103 comments
by IdiotSavant - Jul 927 comments
by gmoke - Jul 9
by Oui - Jul 82 comments
by Oui - Jul 84 comments