The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
That "about 125,000" should have been "about 25,000" -- 25,296 to be exact. Sorry for the gross mistake. ... all progress depends on the unreasonable mensch.(apologies to G.B. Shaw)
Of course, I will always argue that the BEST way to eliminate homelessness is to create more good-paying jobs (well, duh!) And the surest way to prosperity is to employ people to build an infrastructure that operates on solar income rather than burn natural capital.
If we do the right thing by the ecosphere, we can afford to do the right things socially. "Remember the I35W bridge--who needs terrorists when there are Republicans"
Of course. I only was commenting on homelessness in Japan in response to gsmoke's comment upthread. Basically, my point was that while homelessness, when you see it in Japan, is shocking and pitiable -- as it should be everywhere -- its occurrence is far lower than in other developed countries. Even in the happiest country in the world, Denmark, the number of homeless as of the beginning of 2007 was conservatively estimated to be 5253. Out of a population of just under five and half million, that comes to 0.096% -- better than France (and of course the U.S.), but still six times worse than Japan's rate.
techno: Of course, I will always argue that the BEST way to eliminate homelessness is to create more good-paying jobs (well, duh!) And the surest way to prosperity is to employ people to build an infrastructure that operates on solar income rather than burn natural capital. If we do the right thing by the ecosphere, we can afford to do the right things socially.
If we do the right thing by the ecosphere, we can afford to do the right things socially.
Hear, hear. That said, doing right by the ecosphere is not sufficient: there also has to be political determination to do the right things socially. ... all progress depends on the unreasonable mensch.(apologies to G.B. Shaw)
They very well may be cooking the books. But I don't think that explains the entire difference.
Japanese social welfare has a bad reputation, but I know there are lots of city- and burrough-level services for providing jobs for the unemployed. If you go to Japan, you will find certain jobs that seem "needless", most conspicuously, uniformed men and women at street construction sites politely waving pedestrians through carefully constructed byways so that they avoid hurting themselves near the site. Any half-careful person could navigate these areas without any guidance, but the presence of these "waver-on's" not only clearly gives you warning that you may need to be a little extra careful around here (especially relevant for Japan's increasingly elderly population), but more importantly, they provide jobs and dignity to people who otherwise may not have such jobs -- and might be on the streets.
Japan also still has a relatively strong sense of family responsibility to elders and family in general. People would rather take care of their own then let them wind up on the streets. For example, my uncle drank himself into decrepit destitution through his adult life (my father is Japanese). No doubt he would have been on the streets had another uncle's wife's resourcefulness not managed to find a way to persuade the local welfare bureau to pay him unemployment and medical insurance (even though I think he normally would not have qualified for these.) While I imagine for any family in any developed society there would be a significant amount of shame in having a homeless family member, I believe this may be particularly so in Japan, where the principle of face is still very significant (though less over time).
Unfortunately I have no numbers to support these hypotheses, just guesses. In short, the numbers may be underreported, but I think there are certain features of Japanese society that also reduce homelessness to a level below other developed countries'. ... all progress depends on the unreasonable mensch.(apologies to G.B. Shaw)
That said, doing right by the ecosphere is not sufficient: there also has to be political determination to do the right things socially.
I argue that ONLY a socially enlightened society will be ABLE to build a sustainable society. For example, it will be impossible to understand the issues of sustainability unless you strike the ideal balance between what is individual and what can best be done as a group. I think a good starting place is 50-50 (which gets me into a LOT of trouble with the libertarians.) "Remember the I35W bridge--who needs terrorists when there are Republicans"
Of course, in the US a substantial amount of homelessness is due to failures of the mental health system, but even so we will be seeing a big spike in homelessness for economic reasons as the recession unfolds. I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 1 6 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 3 11 comments
by Oui - Sep 6 2 comments
by gmoke - Aug 25 1 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 21 1 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 22 55 comments
by Oui - Aug 18 8 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 12 25 comments
by Oui - Sep 7
by Oui - Sep 62 comments
by Oui - Sep 52 comments
by gmoke - Sep 5
by Oui - Sep 41 comment
by Oui - Sep 47 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 311 comments
by Oui - Sep 211 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 16 comments
by Oui - Sep 114 comments
by Oui - Sep 171 comments
by Oui - Sep 11 comment
by gmoke - Aug 29
by Oui - Aug 2818 comments
by Oui - Aug 271 comment
by Oui - Aug 262 comments
by Oui - Aug 2626 comments
by Oui - Aug 251 comment
by Oui - Aug 254 comments