Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
techno: Just so you remember.  The social distribution of wealth and the costs of housing are very separate and wholly unrelated issues to whether a country can create enough green technologies to reduce their carbon footprint by 80%.

Of course.  I only was commenting on homelessness in Japan in response to gsmoke's comment upthread.  Basically, my point was that while homelessness, when you see it in Japan, is shocking and pitiable -- as it should be everywhere -- its occurrence is far lower than in other developed countries.  Even in the happiest country in the world, Denmark, the number of homeless as of the beginning of 2007 was conservatively estimated to be 5253.  Out of a population of just under five and half million, that comes to 0.096% -- better than France (and of course the U.S.), but still six times worse than Japan's rate.

techno: Of course, I will always argue that the BEST way to eliminate homelessness is to create more good-paying jobs (well, duh!)  And the surest way to prosperity is to employ people to build an infrastructure that operates on solar income rather than burn natural capital.

If we do the right thing by the ecosphere, we can afford to do the right things socially.

Hear, hear.  That said, doing right by the ecosphere is not sufficient: there also has to be political determination to do the right things socially.

... all progress depends on the unreasonable mensch.
(apologies to G.B. Shaw)

by marco on Mon Jun 23rd, 2008 at 02:49:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Others have rated this comment as follows:

Display:

Occasional Series