Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
It's even worse, it's an own initiative report, that is, a hobby horse of the MEP herself
As weblogs represent an important new contribution to media pluralism, there is a need to clarify their status, and to create legal safeguards for use in the event of lawsuits as well as to establish a right to reply, says a recent own initiative report drafted by Estonian Socialist Marianne Mikko. Own initiative reports are drafted by individual MEPs and are not proposals for EU laws. The report was later adopted by Parliament's Culture Committee


When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jun 26th, 2008 at 02:24:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Well it was adopted by a committee in the EP, then. Which is bad enough.

There's no telling with these kinds of initiatives. The current Commission will definitely not be looking for more embarrassment by picking this up. All the same, it might resurface somewhere in the background of a white paper, in a year, or something.

Not an acute threat, but it might be worthwhile to somehow keep a tab on it.

(It's still easy to get angry, because how dumb are these people! As weblogs represent an important new contribution to media pluralism, there is a need [...] to establish a right to reply ... The centre right EPP-ED member did concede however that some legal issues such as [...] the right of reply need to be addressed. You want a right to reply? Get a blog! It's free! It's simple!)

by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Thu Jun 26th, 2008 at 02:45:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]
You want a right to reply? Post a comment!

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jun 26th, 2008 at 02:48:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Indeed.

I'd like for all blogs to have comments.

But I don't know if I'd want that to be legally required.

by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Thu Jun 26th, 2008 at 02:55:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Blogs without comments have a lower readership, generally.

And then, a blog without comments is just a personal webpage. Is Mikko going to require registration of those?

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes

by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jun 26th, 2008 at 02:57:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The report could still be killed by the Plenary.

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jun 26th, 2008 at 02:48:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]
EP Rules of Procedure:
TITLE II : LEGISLATIVE, BUDGETARY AND OTHER PROCEDURES
CHAPTER 2 : PROCEDURE IN COMMITTEE
Rule 45  : Own-initiative reports

  1.    A committee intending to draw up a report and to submit a motion for a resolution to Parliament on a subject within its competence on which neither a consultation nor a request for an opinion has been referred to it pursuant to Rule 179(1) may do so only with the authorisation of the Conference of Presidents. Where such authorisation is withheld the reason must always be stated.
    The Conference of Presidents shall take a decision on requests for authorisation to draw up reports submitted pursuant to paragraph 1 on the basis of implementing provisions which it shall itself lay down. If a committee's competence to draw up a report for which it has requested authorisation is challenged, the Conference of Presidents shall take a decision within six weeks on the basis of a recommendation from the Conference of Committee Chairmen, or, if no such recommendation is forthcoming, from its chairman. If the Conference of Presidents fails to take a decision within that period, the recommendation shall be declared to have been approved.

  2.    The provisions of this Rule shall apply mutatis mutandis in cases where the Treaties attribute the right of initiative to Parliament.
    In such cases, the Conference of Presidents shall take a decision within two months.
So, an own-initiative report will result in a motion for a resolution.
TITLE IV : RELATIONS WITH OTHER BODIES
CHAPTER 5 : RESOLUTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Rule 113  : Motions for resolutions

  1.    Any Member may table a motion for a resolution on a matter falling within the sphere of activities of the European Union.
    The motion may not comprise more than 200 words.

  2.    The committee responsible shall decide what procedure is to be adopted.
    It may combine the motion for a resolution with other motions for resolutions or reports.
    It may adopt an opinion, which may take the form of a letter.
    It may decide to draw up a report pursuant to Rule 45.

  3.    The authors of a motion for a resolution shall be informed of the decisions of the committee and the Conference of Presidents.

  4.    The report shall contain the text of the motion for a resolution.

  5.    Opinions in the form of a letter addressed to other institutions of the European Union shall be forwarded by the President.

  6.    The author or authors of a motion for a resolution tabled pursuant to Rule 103(2), 108(5) or 115(2) shall be entitled to withdraw it before the final vote.

  7.    A motion for a resolution tabled pursuant to paragraph 1 may be withdrawn by its author, authors or first signatory before the committee responsible has decided, pursuant to paragraph 2, to draw up a report on it.
    Once the motion has been thus taken over by the committee, only the committee shall be empowered to withdraw it up until the opening of the final vote.

  8.    A motion for a resolution withdrawn may be taken over and retabled immediately by a group, a committee or the same number of Members who are entitled to table it.
    Committees have a duty to ensure that motions for resolutions tabled pursuant to this Rule which meet the requirements laid down are followed up and duly referred to in documents produced as a result.


When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jun 26th, 2008 at 02:54:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]
It was adopted in the Culture and Education committee almost unanimously.

You can't be me, I'm taken
by Sven Triloqvist on Thu Jun 26th, 2008 at 03:07:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Please tell me that Guardans voted against.

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jun 26th, 2008 at 03:09:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]
He proposed some good amendments but I can't yet work out whether they were adopted or not.

 for instance, his amendment No. 9

whereas the UNESCO Convention on the protection and promotion of the  diversity of cultural expression attaches considerable importance to the creation of conditions conducive to media diversity.


You can't be me, I'm taken

by Sven Triloqvist on Thu Jun 26th, 2008 at 03:36:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Minutes
Final vote: the draft opinion was adopted by 33 votes to 1, with 0 abstentions.


When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jun 26th, 2008 at 03:24:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Is there a list of the amendments?

Before flaying them with ethernet cables we should at least find out exactly what they did and didn't vote for.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Thu Jun 26th, 2008 at 03:33:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Amendments here to be cross checked against voting at migu's earlier pdf link

You can't be me, I'm taken
by Sven Triloqvist on Thu Jun 26th, 2008 at 03:38:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The minutes have a list of the amendments "adopte, rejected, fallen and withdrawn".

There is a list of 242 amendments here in PDF.

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes

by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jun 26th, 2008 at 03:41:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Now this is interesting:

Motion for a resolution
C. whereas the unrestricted concentration
of ownership might jeopardise pluralism
and cultural diversity and whereas in
certain markets it is approaching a limit
whereby pluralism will no longer be
automatically guaranteed by free market
competition,

Amendment
C. whereas experience shows that the
unrestricted concentration of ownership
jeopardises pluralism and cultural diversity
and whereas a system purely based on free
market competition alone is not able to
guarantee media pluralism,

A few of these around 24, described as 'fallen.'

Good news: Someone is fighting our corner
Bad news: They're not winning.

Even so - getting this into the minutes has to count for something.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Thu Jun 26th, 2008 at 04:02:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Reading these pdfs is an insight into an arcane process.

I imagine that - with the enormous amount of written documentation - that sometimes legislation emerges that has been beaten into submission in earlier committees, and bubbles on upwards to the surface of voting as 'accepted wisdom' without the original opposing arguments ever being reconsidered.

I can't decide whether this carefully designed process can be gamed or not.

You can't be me, I'm taken

by Sven Triloqvist on Thu Jun 26th, 2008 at 04:21:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Having trawled through this, I'm not seeing anything worth getting over-excited about. The most controversial proposal is a call for self-regulation, which is hardly a major legal imposition, and 'clarification of the legal status' of blogs.

I'm not sure how the legal status can be clarified. The law seems clear enough in cases of libel or defamation, and it's not as if tradmedia have a particularly clear legal position.

The rest of the document is some rather limp and half-hearted discussion of tradmed plurality, with a view towards going forward etc etc towards guaranteeing standards and a vague sense of unease that perhaps too many media barons might not be an entirely good thing.

Maybe Brussels can turn this lettuce leaf document into a fierce protection of media consumer rights. Somehow I doubt it.

In the meantime we seem to be safe from 3am visits from the State Blog Police - so I think we can relax for now.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Thu Jun 26th, 2008 at 04:15:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]
we seem to be safe from 3am visits from the State Blog Police

I'm sure Phony Tony's got you on some terrorist watch-list somewhere in the bowels of MI5.  You just don't know it yet.

This MEP is very condescending towards blogs, but that's par for the course in Serious journalism nowadays.  Joke Line will undoubtedly be knocking down our door any day now.

Doesn't seem to be a terribly worrying thing to me.

Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to your country.

by Drew J Jones (pedobear@pennstatefootball.com) on Thu Jun 26th, 2008 at 10:19:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series