The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
As weblogs represent an important new contribution to media pluralism, there is a need to clarify their status, and to create legal safeguards for use in the event of lawsuits as well as to establish a right to reply, says a recent own initiative report drafted by Estonian Socialist Marianne Mikko. Own initiative reports are drafted by individual MEPs and are not proposals for EU laws. The report was later adopted by Parliament's Culture Committee
There's no telling with these kinds of initiatives. The current Commission will definitely not be looking for more embarrassment by picking this up. All the same, it might resurface somewhere in the background of a white paper, in a year, or something.
Not an acute threat, but it might be worthwhile to somehow keep a tab on it.
(It's still easy to get angry, because how dumb are these people! As weblogs represent an important new contribution to media pluralism, there is a need [...] to establish a right to reply ... The centre right EPP-ED member did concede however that some legal issues such as [...] the right of reply need to be addressed. You want a right to reply? Get a blog! It's free! It's simple!)
I'd like for all blogs to have comments.
But I don't know if I'd want that to be legally required.
And then, a blog without comments is just a personal webpage. Is Mikko going to require registration of those? When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
TITLE II : LEGISLATIVE, BUDGETARY AND OTHER PROCEDURES CHAPTER 2 : PROCEDURE IN COMMITTEE Rule 45 : Own-initiative reports A committee intending to draw up a report and to submit a motion for a resolution to Parliament on a subject within its competence on which neither a consultation nor a request for an opinion has been referred to it pursuant to Rule 179(1) may do so only with the authorisation of the Conference of Presidents. Where such authorisation is withheld the reason must always be stated.The Conference of Presidents shall take a decision on requests for authorisation to draw up reports submitted pursuant to paragraph 1 on the basis of implementing provisions which it shall itself lay down. If a committee's competence to draw up a report for which it has requested authorisation is challenged, the Conference of Presidents shall take a decision within six weeks on the basis of a recommendation from the Conference of Committee Chairmen, or, if no such recommendation is forthcoming, from its chairman. If the Conference of Presidents fails to take a decision within that period, the recommendation shall be declared to have been approved. The provisions of this Rule shall apply mutatis mutandis in cases where the Treaties attribute the right of initiative to Parliament.In such cases, the Conference of Presidents shall take a decision within two months.
TITLE IV : RELATIONS WITH OTHER BODIES CHAPTER 5 : RESOLUTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Rule 113 : Motions for resolutions Any Member may table a motion for a resolution on a matter falling within the sphere of activities of the European Union.The motion may not comprise more than 200 words. The committee responsible shall decide what procedure is to be adopted.It may combine the motion for a resolution with other motions for resolutions or reports.It may adopt an opinion, which may take the form of a letter.It may decide to draw up a report pursuant to Rule 45. The authors of a motion for a resolution shall be informed of the decisions of the committee and the Conference of Presidents. The report shall contain the text of the motion for a resolution. Opinions in the form of a letter addressed to other institutions of the European Union shall be forwarded by the President. The author or authors of a motion for a resolution tabled pursuant to Rule 103(2), 108(5) or 115(2) shall be entitled to withdraw it before the final vote. A motion for a resolution tabled pursuant to paragraph 1 may be withdrawn by its author, authors or first signatory before the committee responsible has decided, pursuant to paragraph 2, to draw up a report on it.Once the motion has been thus taken over by the committee, only the committee shall be empowered to withdraw it up until the opening of the final vote. A motion for a resolution withdrawn may be taken over and retabled immediately by a group, a committee or the same number of Members who are entitled to table it.Committees have a duty to ensure that motions for resolutions tabled pursuant to this Rule which meet the requirements laid down are followed up and duly referred to in documents produced as a result.
for instance, his amendment No. 9
whereas the UNESCO Convention on the protection and promotion of the diversity of cultural expression attaches considerable importance to the creation of conditions conducive to media diversity. You can't be me, I'm taken
Final vote: the draft opinion was adopted by 33 votes to 1, with 0 abstentions.
Before flaying them with ethernet cables we should at least find out exactly what they did and didn't vote for.
There is a list of 242 amendments here in PDF. When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
Motion for a resolution C. whereas the unrestricted concentration of ownership might jeopardise pluralism and cultural diversity and whereas in certain markets it is approaching a limit whereby pluralism will no longer be automatically guaranteed by free market competition, Amendment C. whereas experience shows that the unrestricted concentration of ownership jeopardises pluralism and cultural diversity and whereas a system purely based on free market competition alone is not able to guarantee media pluralism,
Amendment C. whereas experience shows that the unrestricted concentration of ownership jeopardises pluralism and cultural diversity and whereas a system purely based on free market competition alone is not able to guarantee media pluralism,
A few of these around 24, described as 'fallen.'
Good news: Someone is fighting our corner Bad news: They're not winning.
Even so - getting this into the minutes has to count for something.
I imagine that - with the enormous amount of written documentation - that sometimes legislation emerges that has been beaten into submission in earlier committees, and bubbles on upwards to the surface of voting as 'accepted wisdom' without the original opposing arguments ever being reconsidered.
I can't decide whether this carefully designed process can be gamed or not. You can't be me, I'm taken
I'm not sure how the legal status can be clarified. The law seems clear enough in cases of libel or defamation, and it's not as if tradmedia have a particularly clear legal position.
The rest of the document is some rather limp and half-hearted discussion of tradmed plurality, with a view towards going forward etc etc towards guaranteeing standards and a vague sense of unease that perhaps too many media barons might not be an entirely good thing.
Maybe Brussels can turn this lettuce leaf document into a fierce protection of media consumer rights. Somehow I doubt it.
In the meantime we seem to be safe from 3am visits from the State Blog Police - so I think we can relax for now.
we seem to be safe from 3am visits from the State Blog Police
I'm sure Phony Tony's got you on some terrorist watch-list somewhere in the bowels of MI5. You just don't know it yet.
This MEP is very condescending towards blogs, but that's par for the course in Serious journalism nowadays. Joke Line will undoubtedly be knocking down our door any day now.
Doesn't seem to be a terribly worrying thing to me. Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to your country.
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 2 6 comments
by gmoke - Sep 27
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 17
by Oui - Oct 121 comment
by Oui - Oct 111 comment
by Oui - Oct 11
by Oui - Oct 10
by Oui - Oct 101 comment
by Oui - Oct 9
by Oui - Oct 91 comment
by Oui - Oct 81 comment
by Oui - Oct 8
by Oui - Oct 74 comments
by Oui - Oct 67 comments
by Oui - Oct 56 comments
by Oui - Oct 4
by Oui - Oct 42 comments
by Oui - Oct 31 comment
by Oui - Oct 24 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 26 comments
by Oui - Oct 214 comments
by Oui - Oct 124 comments