The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
That's the way it used to be: small settlements had their own bakers, shoemakers, etc. Trade was generally restricted to raw materials that could only be obtained in special places, like spices.
As far as we know through historical and archaeological research, from very early on (probably long before the Phoenicians), trade was not only about raw materials, but also manufactured goods (like wine, ceramics, fabric, perfumes, jewels...). Being (as I am) in favour of economic subsidiarity doesn't mean we have to rewrite history.
You are also grossly misrepresenting what is fair trade. The fair trade rules imply to pay to the producers (often organised in co-operatives) a price that allows them not only to survive, but also to improve their living standards and to give education to their children. It usually provides also ways to finance investment in new production means. "Dieu se rit des hommes qui se plaignent des conséquences alors qu'ils en chérissent les causes" Jacques-Bénigne Bossuet
Also, long range trade until the Antiquity was pretty much restricted to luxury goods (now, really, wine is a luxury) ; did trade have an impact on the average joe ? Un roi sans divertissement est un homme plein de misères
by gmoke - Nov 28
by gmoke - Nov 12 9 comments
by Oui - Dec 5
by Oui - Dec 41 comment
by Oui - Dec 2
by Oui - Dec 124 comments
by Oui - Dec 16 comments
by gmoke - Nov 303 comments
by Oui - Nov 3012 comments
by Oui - Nov 2838 comments
by Oui - Nov 2713 comments
by Oui - Nov 2511 comments
by Oui - Nov 24
by Oui - Nov 221 comment
by Oui - Nov 22
by Oui - Nov 2119 comments
by Oui - Nov 1615 comments
by Oui - Nov 154 comments
by Oui - Nov 1319 comments
by Oui - Nov 1224 comments
by gmoke - Nov 129 comments