The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
But the fact that the financial sector was in a state of financial fragility was straightforward, from historical comparison with the states of previous financial systems prior to serious financial collapses, and the fact that sooner or later a financial system in that state is going to have a breathtaking collapse that threatens to seriously damage the productive sector of the economy is straightforward from a cause and effect explanation of how a financial system is exposed to collapse when it is in a financially fragile state.
Of course, as a mathematical trader, it wasn't Taleb's job to look at the state of the financial system as a whole, but rather to develop quantitative models which allow instantaneous hedging etc of the portfolios he was actually responsible for. That means riding the wave, or more precisely being able to predict parameters over the short term, since (in principle) he could always adapt his algorithms to the reality as it progresses.
The turkey graph is a nice soundbyte example though, easy for people to quote in their blogs and propagate without much context. -- $E(X_t|F_s) = X_s,\quad t > s$
... its that they act as if its the first new economy we have ever had. We have had new economies, within the basic institutional framework of monetary production economies, all the time, and one constant is that new economies mean new systemic risk that we learn about when they are first realized.
So in developing high frequency models of stochastic risk that take the range of possible values as something that has to be determined from experience, but then ignoring the historical experience of monetary production economies .... his models are lying about systemic risk.
A misunderstanding of system behavior leads to a mis-estimate of systemic risks, and since the presumption in that form of modeling informed by traditional marginalist economics is to assign a value of 0 to the possibility of true uncertainty, its always an underestimate. I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 10 3 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 1 6 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 3 28 comments
by Oui - Sep 6 3 comments
by gmoke - Aug 25 1 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 21 1 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 22 56 comments
by Oui - Aug 18 8 comments
by Oui - Sep 106 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 103 comments
by Oui - Sep 10
by Oui - Sep 9
by Oui - Sep 8
by Oui - Sep 84 comments
by Oui - Sep 7
by Oui - Sep 63 comments
by Oui - Sep 54 comments
by gmoke - Sep 5
by Oui - Sep 43 comments
by Oui - Sep 47 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 328 comments
by Oui - Sep 211 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 16 comments
by Oui - Sep 114 comments
by Oui - Sep 1100 comments
by Oui - Sep 11 comment
by gmoke - Aug 29