Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
But the fact that the financial sector was in a state of financial fragility was straightforward, from historical comparison with the states of previous financial systems prior to serious financial collapses, and the fact that sooner or later a financial system in that state is going to have a breathtaking collapse that threatens to seriously damage the productive sector of the economy is straightforward from a cause and effect explanation of how a financial system is exposed to collapse when it is in a financially fragile state.
In other words, do not believe people whenever they talk about a "new economy".

Of course, as a mathematical trader, it wasn't Taleb's job to look at the state of the financial system as a whole, but rather to develop quantitative models which allow instantaneous hedging etc of the portfolios he was actually responsible for. That means riding the wave, or more precisely being able to predict parameters over the short term, since (in principle) he could always adapt his algorithms to the reality as it progresses.

The turkey graph is a nice soundbyte example though, easy for people to quote in their blogs and propagate without much context.

--
$E(X_t|F_s) = X_s,\quad t > s$

by martingale on Wed Sep 24th, 2008 at 09:37:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Its not that when people talk about the new economy, they are lying ...

... its that they act as if its the first new economy we have ever had. We have had new economies, within the basic institutional framework of monetary production economies, all the time, and one constant is that new economies mean new systemic risk that we learn about when they are first realized.

So in developing high frequency models of stochastic risk that take the range of possible values as something that has to be determined from experience, but then ignoring the historical experience of monetary production economies .... his models are lying about systemic risk.

A misunderstanding of system behavior leads to a mis-estimate of systemic risks, and since the presumption in that form of modeling informed by traditional marginalist economics is to assign a value of 0 to the possibility of true uncertainty, its always an underestimate.


I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Thu Sep 25th, 2008 at 12:30:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series