The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
But my approach these days is no longer to attack the existing system - there's no need, it's doing a wonderful job of discrediting itself.
Instead, my strategy is to point out and facilitate as best I can the emerging new alternatives to conventional wisdom and allow people to make their own comparisons. "The future is already here -- it's just not very evenly distributed" William Gibson
Money, despite what Pink Floyd had to say on the subject, is not the root of all evil today. Capital is. It's that distinction that Marx makes between industrial and and financial capitalism.
Money simply facilitates transactions, capital requires a return.
I understand what you are saying about the system discrediting itself, but I think that there among the people at the top in the United States, neo-liberalism has become nothing short of a religion.
You have to break their gods, in order from them to get it, because their beliefs are based in faith not reason.
Even people who spout the rhetoric of change, aka the incoming president, are agents of the status quo. Obama is talking about cutting public pensions and healthcare, that hardly strikes me as the sort of change that we need. And I'll give my consent to any government that does not deny a man a living wage-Billy Bragg
I would say firstly that unsecured credit facilitates transactions, and has a cost consisting of shared system costs and defaults.
Secured credit and conventional Equity in a Corporation are the conflicting financial claims (financial capital) over productive assets (industrial capital) which require a return.
However, this return is paid for from the sale of production/ use value of the relevant productive assets.
Ther is nothing wrong with a cost of credit or a return on capital per se.
The key problem lies in the fact that interest-bearing credit currently is money. The increasing inequalities in access to this credit combine with exclusive ownership of productive assets - and particularly the Commons of land, non-renewable resources and knowledge - to create a continuing and finally unsustainable transfer of wealth. "The future is already here -- it's just not very evenly distributed" William Gibson
What is needed is an intelligent and highly selective repudiation of such debt.
I think it is possible to transform the vast pools of unrepayable property-backed debt to a form of finance which does not have to be repaid ie Equity - just "not Equity as we know it, Jim".
We may achieve this Unitisation within a framework based upon Partnership law (%age shares or "nth's"), rather than Trust law (Units in Unit Trusts) or Company law (conventional shares).
The result is not so much repudiation as transformation.
The holder of distressed (ie unrepayable) debt exchanges his bonds for Units. He has no right to get his capital back from the user of the capital (the Occupier) but he can get some or all of his Capital back from other investors by selling to them his Units in the resulting "Rental Pool".
The amount he gets back depends on the rate of return on Capital investors require.
Since we index-link the Occupier's rental a rate of 2 to 3% is good in the current climate. The crucial point is that because the resulting rental is genuinely "affordable" (in large part because the obligation torepay Capital has been removed) it is therefore more likely it will be paid and the lower risk justifies the lower rate of return. "The future is already here -- it's just not very evenly distributed" William Gibson
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 2 3 comments
by gmoke - Sep 27
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 17
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 10 3 comments
by Oui - Oct 4
by Oui - Oct 41 comment
by Oui - Oct 31 comment
by Oui - Oct 24 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 23 comments
by Oui - Oct 214 comments
by Oui - Oct 115 comments
by Oui - Oct 120 comments
by Oui - Sep 30
by Oui - Sep 303 comments
by Oui - Sep 2819 comments
by Oui - Sep 28
by Oui - Sep 276 comments
by Oui - Sep 271 comment
by Oui - Sep 263 comments
by Oui - Sep 266 comments
by Oui - Sep 251 comment
by Oui - Sep 252 comments
by Oui - Sep 2410 comments