The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
We are not in a full employment economy, and beyond the level of effective demand, there is no benefit to employers in hiring more workers, no matter how low a wage they are willing to accept. So the D:L curve should go downward sloping to the quantity of labor for which there is effective demand, and then drop vertically to the L axis.
Drop the wage, and its not inside the diagram that the reduction in the size of the pie occurs, but outside the diagram in the income feedbacks ... the result of the wage suppression is a reduction in effective demand and a leftward shift in D:L.
If unwilling to cure the Anglo disease, the temporary response is therefore to find unsustainable short term arrangements to prop up effective demand, replacing the effective demand lost due to wage suppression. I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
But your labor demand curve has the wrong shape for low-wage labor in high-income Anglo Disease nations.
I'm having a hard time visualizing this, can draw a picture for me? And I'll give my consent to any government that does not deny a man a living wage-Billy Bragg
The result when labor supply intersects within the zone of nil or negligible wage-elasticity of demand for labor is a bargaining range scenario, where there is no technical determinant of position within the wage and relative bargaining power is expected to determine position within the range.
Not all labor markets will be within the bargaining range for the same overall labor market conditions and same minimum wage ... and of course, this does not apply to a full employment economy (and hence does not apply within the standard economic modeling, which assumes from the outset a long-run tendency to full employment), but the empirical results tend to suggest that observed gross elasticity is nil or negligible, so if the partial elasticity is negative, it is offset by a positive income effect. I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
by gmoke - Sep 13
by gmoke - Aug 25
by Oui - Sep 16
by Oui - Sep 15
by Oui - Sep 14
by Oui - Sep 142 comments
by Oui - Sep 137 comments
by Oui - Sep 12
by Oui - Sep 114 comments
by Oui - Sep 111 comment
by Oui - Sep 105 comments
by Oui - Sep 9
by Oui - Sep 87 comments
by Oui - Sep 811 comments
by Oui - Sep 6
by Oui - Sep 43 comments
by Oui - Sep 1
by Oui - Aug 31