The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Of course it's biased. Look at the judges - 90% of them are from NATO countries.
OK, there's a point. It would have been better to have Russian, Chinese, African and South American judges as well.
Of course it's biased. Courts are ALWAYS biased to reflect political orientations. From the Inquisition to modern day Italy (where Berlusconi has completely fucked up the legal system for his personal benefit).
So we might as well abolish the whole silly notion of independent judicial review? Trials are always scams designed to cover the actions of repressive state intervention with a veneer of plausible deniability? Judges are universally corrupt and submissive to the whims of shadowy political masters?
Of course it's biased. The ITCY will never bring to trial those who ordered and executed NATO bombings against civilian targets in Serbia - against the Geneva convention and without UN approval.
And that is relevant to whether Serbian indictees committed war crimes in which way, again?
Of course it's biased. Whereas a large portion of the Serb political and military LEADERSHIP has been indicted and convicted (or died in the process of), the same treatment was NEVER applied to Croats, Albanians or Muslims.
Of course it's biased. The ratio of indicted and convicted to civilian casualties from the 4 ethnic and/or religious groups STRONGLY SUGGEST that Serbs are getting the most severe treatment...
I completed a statistical analysis to test whether the difference between the means of the Serb data set and the non Serb data set was significant. The results indicated that, indeed, the means were significantly different with a 95% confidence interval.
No, it did not. It indicated that your understanding of statistics is significantly deficient, with a 95 % confidence interval.
Jake and Migeru have criticized this that and the other assumption, indicator, test used, etc. to demonstrate that in fact... what?
That you have not made a case.
What is it that you want to demonstrate? That the ICTY isn't biased?
That there has been no good evidence on display so far on ET that would indicate that the ICTY is significantly biased.
Is that what you believe? If yes, can you offer evidence to back your claim?
You're the one making a big production about that court.
Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.
by Frank Schnittger - May 31
by Oui - May 30 15 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 23 3 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 27 3 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 5 22 comments
by Oui - May 13 66 comments
by Carrie - Apr 30 7 comments
by Oui - Jun 17 comments
by Oui - May 3125 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 31
by Oui - May 3015 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 273 comments
by Oui - May 2726 comments
by Oui - May 24
by Frank Schnittger - May 233 comments
by Oui - May 1366 comments
by Oui - May 910 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 522 comments
by Oui - May 450 comments
by Oui - May 312 comments
by Oui - Apr 30273 comments
by Carrie - Apr 307 comments
by Oui - Apr 2646 comments
by Oui - Apr 889 comments
by Oui - Mar 19144 comments