In Iceland's Fall, We Sin All | 36 comments (36 topical, editorial, 0 hidden)

Re: Oddly enough, it was Chile ... (none / 0)

You will notice that Iceland's democratic traditions or lack thereof never featured in my analysis. What makes it politically expensive to go after Iceland is that it's got too many white, Christian people. (Or rather, it's located in a part of the world where most Americans think there's a lot of white, Christian people - I doubt the actual demographics matter any more than the length or depth of their democratic traditions.)

- Jake

Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Mon Apr 27th, 2009 at 03:39:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Oddly enough, it was Chile ... (none / 1)

But it also makes it a bigger win for a TNC that succeeds in screwing Iceland out of some valuable resource ... a parasite often does better in a host with few other parasites.

I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Mon Apr 27th, 2009 at 08:45:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Oddly enough, it was Chile ... (4.00 / 2)

Only assuming they get to actually keep it. We aren't - quite - living in a Shadowrun scenario (yet): If a transnat goes up against a determined, sovereign government, the transnat is going to lose.

- Jake

Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Mon Apr 27th, 2009 at 02:19:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Oddly enough, it was Chile ... (4.00 / 2)

There are more binding constraints on a small island economy than on a large economy, which gets back to the tacit premises of the "Iceland is too 'Western' to fall prey" argument, which is that if Iceland puts up a determined resistance, it will find a sympathetic hearing in countries that are large enough economically that a transnational has to take their concerns seriously.

I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Mon Apr 27th, 2009 at 11:03:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Americans are not going to go to the (none / 1)

defense of Iceland.

The media narrative will run on very different lines, you may be sure. If Alcoa even gets mentioned, it will be as the Great Benefactor.

Americans know nothing about Iceland, and their imaginings can be manipulated.

The Fates are kind.

by Gaianne on Wed Apr 29th, 2009 at 02:40:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Americans are not going to go to the (none / 1)

But doing a Pinochet on Iceland will piss off Norway no end. And Norway has oil.

Oh, and if you're really unlucky, pissing off Norway might piss off Germany too. And they have ball bearings.

- Jake

Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Wed Apr 29th, 2009 at 03:07:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]

In Iceland's Fall, We Sin All | 36 comments (36 topical, 0 editorial, 0 hidden)

Top Diaries

Ireland 2023 Rugby World Cup Squad selected

Integrating Ukraine Into NATO Family

Leinster's demise and Munster's hope

Southern Irish disinterest in Northern Ireland affairs

The end is Nigh?

Joe Biden. America's Interventionist Hero

The law of conservation of transness

Recent Diaries

Bi-Partisan Effort to Undermine Democracy

June 2023

Ireland 2023 Rugby World Cup Squad selected

Integrating Ukraine Into NATO Family

Southern Irish disinterest in Northern Ireland affairs

Incident Ukrainian War Display Gets Int'l Attention

German Climate Activists Group Outlawed

Leinster's demise and Munster's hope

Joe Biden. America's Interventionist Hero

Targeted Assassinations: a Bankrupt Strategy

The end is Nigh?

Hijacking Peace by Zelensky for War Escalation

UA Drone Attack On Moscow

Rightwing Operation New EU 'Enlightenment’

May 2023

The law of conservation of transness

US Provoked Conflict In Europe

U.S. Will Be Ousted From Middle-East

Settler Extremism Blessed by Jerusalem Leaders

Occasional Series