The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Why Europe will run the 21st century What Europe has, argues Mark Leonard in his provocatively titled book, Why Europe Will Run the 21st Century, is a model, one centered around a new understanding of power and embodied in the institutions and norms of the European Union. The EU exerts an irresistible attraction on the countries around it, Leonard says, drawing them into its orbit, embedding them in its legal and economic framework and changing them from the inside out. Next to this "transformative power," the United States' military might, which can change regimes but not societies, and whose application is necessarily fleeting, seems a weak instrument indeed. Increasingly, Leonard tells us, we'll see more regional groupings emerge bound, as the EU is, by mutual self-interest and common values. It's in this sense, he argues, that Europe--or, more precisely, the "European way"--will dominate the 21st century. Leonard is Director of Foreign Policy at the Center for European Reform in London, where he works on transatlantic and EU-China relations. He recently spoke with Mother Jones by phone from the UK. Mother Jones: As we're forever being told, the United States is the most powerful country in the history of the world and is likely to remain so, even as China rises, for the foreseeable future. But you're arguing that this view rests on a minsunderstanding of power. How so? Mark Leonard: My book isn't about Europe so much as it's about power, and how you go about getting your way and acting in the world. I'm not arguing that Europe will be the most vibrant economic bloc in the world or that it will have the biggest army; I'm saying that the European way of doing things, the European model, will change the way the world works. What we're coming to realize is that the classic 19th century idea of power is coming unstuck in an interdependent, globalized world. In this world, military power is still important, but it's becoming less so, and the price for using it is much higher than before, as the US has found in Iraq. http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2005/10/why-europe-will-run-21st-century
Why Europe will run the 21st century
What Europe has, argues Mark Leonard in his provocatively titled book, Why Europe Will Run the 21st Century, is a model, one centered around a new understanding of power and embodied in the institutions and norms of the European Union. The EU exerts an irresistible attraction on the countries around it, Leonard says, drawing them into its orbit, embedding them in its legal and economic framework and changing them from the inside out. Next to this "transformative power," the United States' military might, which can change regimes but not societies, and whose application is necessarily fleeting, seems a weak instrument indeed. Increasingly, Leonard tells us, we'll see more regional groupings emerge bound, as the EU is, by mutual self-interest and common values. It's in this sense, he argues, that Europe--or, more precisely, the "European way"--will dominate the 21st century.
Leonard is Director of Foreign Policy at the Center for European Reform in London, where he works on transatlantic and EU-China relations. He recently spoke with Mother Jones by phone from the UK.
Mother Jones: As we're forever being told, the United States is the most powerful country in the history of the world and is likely to remain so, even as China rises, for the foreseeable future. But you're arguing that this view rests on a minsunderstanding of power. How so?
Mark Leonard: My book isn't about Europe so much as it's about power, and how you go about getting your way and acting in the world. I'm not arguing that Europe will be the most vibrant economic bloc in the world or that it will have the biggest army; I'm saying that the European way of doing things, the European model, will change the way the world works.
What we're coming to realize is that the classic 19th century idea of power is coming unstuck in an interdependent, globalized world. In this world, military power is still important, but it's becoming less so, and the price for using it is much higher than before, as the US has found in Iraq.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2005/10/why-europe-will-run-21st-century
And note that the EU's influence (on things like technical standards, and pretty much anything that requires sophisticated regulation) goes far beyond its formal limits. In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
The apparent redundancy of many different committees addressing the same problems is also good. etc etc. The more like the brain it gets, the better imo ;-)
The greatest danger we face in the EU is the establishment of rigid top-down hierarchies. You can't be me, I'm taken
The apparent redundancy of many different committees addressing the same problems is also good. etc etc. The more like the brain it gets, the better imo ;-) The greatest danger we face in the EU is the establishment of rigid top-down hierarchies.
The greatest danger we face in the EU is the establishment of rigid top-down hierarchies.
Compare to the human body. The brain runs the show (rigid top-down hierarchy) and the body (the citizenry) performs the functions it is told to perform. Apparently nature "thinks" that this is a good design; check out the success of the various species with big brains. And what killed off the dinosaurs after 160 billion years? A huge rock from space that the poor bastards couldn't do anything about because they didn't have the technology.
Please notice how the successful human body deals with "dissent". Cancers (dangers from within) must be stopped and are constantly being destroyed by a healthy immune system. Invaders (bacteria, fungi, viruses) are not negotiated with; they are destroyed.
Any more brain analogies anyone? :) They tried to assimilate me. They failed.
Any living body is bottom up,
In your dreams. Sven, buddy. Stick to music/arts. It's your strength. Biology/science ain't your field. They tried to assimilate me. They failed.
Well, I guess it is but I don't see how it's going to,
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 26 3 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 31
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 22 3 comments
by Cat - Jan 25 55 comments
by Oui - Jan 9 21 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 13 28 comments
by gmoke - Jan 20
by Oui - Jan 15 91 comments
by Oui - Feb 13 comments
by gmoke - Jan 29
by Oui - Jan 2731 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 263 comments
by Cat - Jan 2555 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 223 comments
by Oui - Jan 2110 comments
by Oui - Jan 21
by Oui - Jan 20
by Oui - Jan 1839 comments
by Oui - Jan 1591 comments
by Oui - Jan 144 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 1328 comments
by Oui - Jan 1221 comments
by Oui - Jan 1120 comments
by Oui - Jan 1034 comments
by Oui - Jan 921 comments
by NBBooks - Jan 810 comments