The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
If there isn't a mechanism for this, consumers will effectively be trading the pool directly, which will be an interesting thing to watch.
Consumers buy physical electricity from the supplier at the market price. They pay for it either with £ or Units. What's difficult about that? If consumers think Units are good value, they buy them from the Pool or from their mates: if they don't they won't.
Re units as currency generally, I am proposing unitising location rental value and certain forms of energy, particularly electricity.
That's it.
Unitising other commodities etc would not necessarily result in fungible currencies - probably wouldn't.
The former are domestically fungible/ acceptable in exchange. They may be acceptable elsewhere, but would not be redeemable elsewhere of course. ie an element of exchange control is pretty much built in.
The latter are pretty much universally acceptable.
The "Value Standard" or Unit of measure would IMHO best be a unit of energy, rather than an arbitrary abstract £, $ or with no basis on anything.
What is more stable than a unit of energy as a reference point? A currency consisting of units redeemable in electricity would be pretty much universal,I think, and for a transitional period, and possibly longer, since carbon fules may be synthesised, Units redeemable in carbon fuels will also be universally acceptable against an energy standard.
A Peer to Peer financial system - like any other - needs some form of quality control or framework of trust. How that may be accountable and democratic in a participative way is a matter for agreement between the users of the service and the providers. "The future is already here -- it's just not very evenly distributed" William Gibson
Consumers buy physical electricity from the supplier at the market price.
Bzzzt, wrong. There is no such thing as an "electricity market."
Thank you for playing. Please try again next week.
A megajoule/square meters double standard, in other words, with 100 % reserve requirements.
How is this different from a fiat currency (essentially a "tax standard" currency) with 100 % reserve requirements? Except that public policy will have even less ability to control the money supply than it has today.
- Jake Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.
Of course there is. By definition. If you buy electricity from any supplier you pay a market price.
You appear to mean an Exchange. And no, there isn't one, for retail customers anyway.
What on earth are you talking about?
Proportional Units - eg billionths - in Pools of land/location rentals will change hands in exchange for whatever buyers and sellers agree, and by reference to whatever value standard they wish to use, fiat or energy.
If a location rental is charged by a community in respect of land of which they have custody then what are essentially local Treasury branches would be in a position to issue redeemable credits based upon this rental.
It's not difficult to value land/location rentals. You should know, the Danes have been doing it for years.
So it's not difficult to manage the issue of Units redeemable in location rental value.
And it really isn't difficult either to manage the issue of Units redeemable in energy by (say) a renewable energy producer or any other producer, come to that. A damn site easier than attempting to measure carbon dioxide emissions.
Both of these would be currencies backed 100% by value. They are consensually acceptable, or not, and are not imposed by fiat.
The key point is that Units of location rentals, and Units redeemed in renewable energy, or out of energy saved, both allow value to be received now in exchange for Units to be redeemed later with intrinsic value created at nil cost.
Unlike units of fiat currency, which is redeemable for......more fiat currency with no intrinsic value. "The future is already here -- it's just not very evenly distributed" William Gibson
So the electricity market consists of the sum of all electricity transactions.
These may be one to one (Peer to Peer): one to many; many to many and so on.
In the electricity "market" there are "sub-markets": including a wholesale market (entered into on specific wholesalemarket terms) and a pretty fragmented retail market. There is competition (sometimes) between wholesale distributors, and retail customers may buy at an agreed price from distributors for an agreed period.
There is typically no homogeneous "market price". Whatever the price a buyer has agreed for his physical supply, he would - if the supplier is a member of the Pool I propose - be able to pay in fiat currency, in Units, or in anything else acceptable to the seller. (eg Tesco Points).
2/ Fiat currencies are backed by the power of the State to collect taxes.
The State is one of a chain of credit intermediaries, and like all intermediaries, redundant. The State as a facilitator and service provider is another issue. "The future is already here -- it's just not very evenly distributed" William Gibson
by Frank Schnittger - May 27 3 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 5 22 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 23 1 comment
by Oui - May 13 65 comments
by Carrie - Apr 30 7 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 273 comments
by Oui - May 2712 comments
by Oui - May 24
by Frank Schnittger - May 231 comment
by Oui - May 1365 comments
by Oui - May 910 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 522 comments
by Oui - May 449 comments
by Oui - May 312 comments
by Oui - May 29 comments
by gmoke - May 1
by Oui - Apr 30258 comments
by Carrie - Apr 307 comments
by Oui - Apr 2644 comments
by Oui - Apr 882 comments
by Oui - Mar 19143 comments