The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
I am quite comfortable with the fact that this is a political problem. Because, as I have noted elsewhere, political problems are somebody's fault, and can be rectified by removing the somebody whose fault it is and replacing him with someone who isn't a problem.
I continue to believe that a serious deterioration is first necessary to focus people's minds. I hope I'm wrong.
Ban OTC transactions and enforce a Tobin tax on all on-exchange transactions.
Modern replication strategies are a bug, not a feature.
Any sequence of trades over time generates some function of the underlying stocks, bonds, etc. If you can write down what function you would like to get, then it is a matter of solving an engineering style control problem to get an approximation of this function within the feasibility constraints represented by the number of allowed trades and asset classes. In other words, you could have a stock market that allows a single time tic per day, or any number of silly constraints, and you could replicate regardless.
How do you control what's in a person's mind? How do you argue politically that companies cannot choose what to buy or sell when they want to? How do you convince your compatriots to vote for somebody who will impose those restrictions? It doesn't sound easy to me.
Under a Tobin Tax scheme, individual participants can have precisely the amount of liquidity that they are willing and able to pay for.
-- $E(X_t|F_s) = X_s,\quad t > s$
Ban OTC? How are you going to do that?
Same way you do with gambling, price fixing cartells or any other contract the government wants to get rid off. Ban the action and give it suitable punishments, make it possible for government to seize assets if the action is revealed, and refuse to let the criminals use the governments resources to uphold the contracts.
Illegal activities will always still happen, but it will be riskier and less profitable. And thus probably less common. Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se
Simple. You cannot legally change ownership of anything that is traded on an exchange without notifying the exchange and paying the Tobin Tax.
The same way that you cannot legally change ownership of a house without notifying the local zoning authority and paying stamp duty.
Private agreements that, at some future point in time, securities that are traded on exchange will change hands should be similarly unenforceable, unless they are registered with the exchange. Precisely the same way that I cannot hold you to a promise you make to sell me your house at some agreed-upon time at some agreed-upon price, unless the contract has been signed and notarised.
Contracts between private third parties require the government to enforce them. So if the government ceases to enforce certain kinds of contracts, they cease to have meaning as contracts and become much vaguer kinds of promises. Private enforcement of such promises is what's known as "blackmail" and it is usually frowned upon in polite society.
Why? A replication strategy is only a sequence of trades, such as any person might do. The difference is in the player's mind. Whereas a casual investor has no idea what the end result of his investment strategy will be, beyond a nebulous hope of increasing his wealth, the replication strategy is designed to create a specified function of the underlying stock.
Yes, and that's the problem. It works on the stock price to generate revenue, rather than the underlying cash flow.
Which is a bug, not a feature.
And Tobin concerns exchange trades only, right? What private companies agree between each other about what they will or will not do on the exchange is not covered, right?
Correct. But if such agreements are not enforced by the state, the first time any party finds itself in a losing bet he can simply walk out without further discussion.
- Jake Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.
Exchanges? Who needs exchanges?
Where's the exchange in the world of FX?
Exchange trading would disappear into "dark pools" of liquidity in five minutes. A lot already has. "The future is already here -- it's just not very evenly distributed" William Gibson
Basel.
It's not a very effective exchange, as a number of SE Asian countries will attest, but it's there.
CLS Bank is the closest thing there is and it's not even remotely possible to operate at the requisite level of granularity.
There is not a cat in hell's chance of a Tobin Tax without a new clearing network created - or evolving - from the ground up. "The future is already here -- it's just not very evenly distributed" William Gibson
by gmoke - Jun 19
by gmoke - Jun 22
by gmoke - Jun 6
by Oui - Jun 24
by Oui - Jun 22
by Oui - Jun 2216 comments
by Oui - Jun 21
by Oui - Jun 208 comments
by Oui - Jun 209 comments
by Oui - Jun 19
by Oui - Jun 192 comments
by Oui - Jun 187 comments
by Oui - Jun 181 comment
by Oui - Jun 1710 comments
by Oui - Jun 166 comments
by Oui - Jun 16
by Oui - Jun 162 comments
by Oui - Jun 1515 comments
by Oui - Jun 141 comment