The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Once that happens we'll see the clampdown of censorship, you mean. One thing about newspapers is that you can publish one in your basement and distribute it at coffee shops. You can't do that on the Internet if the government doesn't want you to.
I think a bigger problem than the loss of the traditional print media is the move of EVERY form of communication to a medium--the Internet--that is so easily controlled: One phone call to the head of you local ISP and you're shut off.
With printed media and radio, there is at least a possibility of non-sanctioned communication, but we've mostly lost both...
The Soviets famously used to licence typewriters and mimeograph machines. What brought down the Soviet Union wasn't internal dissidence and samizdat, it was external propaganda and cultural missionary engineering.
Even if an ISP shuts you off you can always use FIDOnet, or some equivalent. If censorship were ever likely it wouldn't take long before Internet gateways and servers started appearing in foreign countries that couldn't be censored directly.
The Chinese have been having an interesting time trying to manage censorship. It sort of works, but it's a long way from being airtight.
A more significant problem on blogs is astro-turfing. If it's done skillfully enough it's far more dangerous and far more influential than sledge-hammer censorship.
The CIA are notorious for the tradmed equivalent of astro-turfing. It would be naive to expect that they're not ready to do the same on blogs.
dKos is already rife with it. As soon as people start getting too critical of Obama, up pops a testimonial to his ineffable awesomeness on the rec list.
If censorship were ever likely it wouldn't take long before Internet gateways and servers started appearing in foreign countries that couldn't be censored directly.
The Pirate Bay has been taken down, blocked etc and proxies and gateways has popped up. So yes that is what happens.
ThatBritGuy:
According to some persons in China - who shall remain anonymous - the real censorship is not in the technical blockade but in the knowledge that using proxies and such might put you on the radar of the security police. So you ask yourself if it is worth it.
I think that the main thrust of internet censorship in Europe is done threw IP-legislation. An early draft of IPRED 2 included a proposal to criminalise patent incursions and give it a maximum sentence of 4 years in prison. So is using a proxy worth it if the proxy technology might be patented? Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 10 3 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 1 6 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 3 28 comments
by Oui - Sep 6 3 comments
by gmoke - Aug 25 1 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 21 1 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 22 56 comments
by Oui - Aug 18 8 comments
by Oui - Sep 107 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 103 comments
by Oui - Sep 10
by Oui - Sep 9
by Oui - Sep 84 comments
by Oui - Sep 7
by Oui - Sep 72 comments
by Oui - Sep 63 comments
by Oui - Sep 54 comments
by gmoke - Sep 5
by Oui - Sep 43 comments
by Oui - Sep 47 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 328 comments
by Oui - Sep 211 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 16 comments
by Oui - Sep 114 comments
by Oui - Sep 1102 comments
by Oui - Sep 11 comment
by gmoke - Aug 29