The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
I never did write that article. For one, I was uncomfortable 'defending' her in any way, even in the abstract when it wasn't really about her, but mostly I didn't have the time then. But some of that discussion, not here on ET at all, but elsewhere including mainstream media, I found to be very disturbing. Maybe we can eventually make language a complete impediment to understanding. -Hobbes
As watchdog files complaint, US vice-presidential candidate says men in her position would not face same scrutiny ... In a complaint filed to the US federal election commission, the group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (Crew) argued that Republicans violated campaign finance rules when they spent $150,000 (£96,000) on clothes for Palin and her family. The purchases came from a joint account, controlled by both national Republicans and John McCain's campaign. At issue is whether the "personal use" ban on buying clothes with campaign money - a reform promoted by McCain himself - applies to such joint accounts.
...
In a complaint filed to the US federal election commission, the group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (Crew) argued that Republicans violated campaign finance rules when they spent $150,000 (£96,000) on clothes for Palin and her family.
The purchases came from a joint account, controlled by both national Republicans and John McCain's campaign. At issue is whether the "personal use" ban on buying clothes with campaign money - a reform promoted by McCain himself - applies to such joint accounts.
And before you say it, this is NOT equivalent to wearing a suit and tie. A dress code is one thing, but this is something else.
double-standard alert!
how do you know what it feels like to be bound by such ludicrous mores as the suit and tie thing? i accept that the pressure is much worse on women, no argument there, but i agree with mig that women do a lot of this to themselves, as we men too do with the inane rules on neck-throttlers at work, or penguin outfits for 'evening' wear.
the whole thing is a preposterous farce, boosted to pimp $ into the fashion industry which knows no gender confinement when it come to iconising the absurd for profit.
men will never know the pains of menstruation or childbirth, and women will never know the pleasure of growing a beard, or the equal pleasure of shaving it off. (or the pain of being kicked in the nuts).
there may be similarities between us, indigestion etc, but largely women are designed entirely differently than us, for some ancient repro reason, (shortly to become totally irrelevant, as science has its merry way with us...)
i find it makes life infinitely interesting, after all our interdependence is as close to absolute as could be.
great rant izzy, whatever it takes to get you sharing your inimitable take on things, works!
the health care diary was as good as anything ever diaried here, imo.
and last but not least, my sympathies for the difficult aspects of being a woman of your intelligence and sensibility in a world being run into total insanity, 90% through male pathology.
the fact that this distortion field reaches as far as your underwear is depressingly unsurprising, i too would feel rage at the madonna-slut dichotomy being laid on/pandered to me, although i'd never be able to diary it so well, lol!
patriarchy sucks. 'The history of public debt is full of irony. It rarely follows our ideas of order and justice.' Thomas Piketty
In fact, any deviation from boring in a man's clothing will be classified as Izzy's
flamboyant, provocative, or slovenly
What a wonderful sentence! I feel I should embroider it on a pillow or something! Maybe we can eventually make language a complete impediment to understanding. -Hobbes
how do you know what it feels like to be bound by such ludicrous mores as the suit and tie thing?
Um...high school? Or is that a peculiarly British perversion? I wore a tie for years.
I don't believe most men really grow up with that, although I do know some of my gay friends have felt versions of it. But even in that case, 'female' is the reviled 'other' -- women are often attacked for BEING sexual, whereas men are often attacked for "teh gay" -- the root of said attacks usually being that 'gay' is too female/girly and less male/manly. Maybe we can eventually make language a complete impediment to understanding. -Hobbes
Look at the Kercher trial and how Amanda Knox's sexuality and 'deviancy' formed the core of all media discussion. Was the sexuality of the men involved in this case under such intense scrutiny?
It seems that there is no escape from the scrutiny of female sexuality and it turns into horrific discussion at times.
you guys said some really cool things too! 'The history of public debt is full of irony. It rarely follows our ideas of order and justice.' Thomas Piketty
betcha never had to wear a jock strap then!
i'm kidding, the only thing that's worse than the surreal strictures men have enslaved themselves to, are the ones endured by women...
:>) 'The history of public debt is full of irony. It rarely follows our ideas of order and justice.' Thomas Piketty
by gmoke - Nov 12 7 comments
by Oui - Nov 28
by Oui - Nov 278 comments
by Oui - Nov 2511 comments
by Oui - Nov 24
by Oui - Nov 22
by Oui - Nov 2119 comments
by Oui - Nov 1615 comments
by Oui - Nov 153 comments
by Oui - Nov 1319 comments
by Oui - Nov 1224 comments
by gmoke - Nov 127 comments
by Oui - Nov 1114 comments
by Oui - Nov 10
by Oui - Nov 928 comments
by Oui - Nov 8
by Oui - Nov 73 comments
by Oui - Nov 633 comments
by Oui - Nov 522 comments
by Oui - Nov 321 comments