The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
if you live in some third-world backwater
Do you have an actual concrete example of such a backwater where the government is subsidising fossil fuels in order to "help the poor"?
Zimbabwe asked to stop money printing by IMF as Sri Lanka trail 1600:20 - LANKA BUSINESS ONLINE
In 2004 Sri Lanka jettisoned an IMF backed growth plan that brought 12-month inflation below 2 percent and exchange rate appreciation for the first time in decades, to return to money printing, fuel subsidies, power subsidies, heavy public sector recruitment and state intervention in agricultural markets including fertilizer subsidies.
I think there are many more examples of poor countries subsidising fuel as wella as other basic goods. Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se
Of course, they aren't subsidising fuel for the poor any more...
- Jake Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.
Incidentally, the IMF article also gives a perfect justification for their work on nuclear energy, without actually saying so.
IMF Survey online: If Iran sold more oil and gas on international markets, would that generate a lot more revenue than if they sold it domestically? Zytek: Yes. At such low prices, domestic demand for energy in Iran has grown very rapidly, and it is increasingly difficult to have energy resources available for export. With the price reform, you will dampen domestic demand, which means more efficient energy use domestically, more energy available for profitable exports, and higher revenues for the country.
Zytek: Yes. At such low prices, domestic demand for energy in Iran has grown very rapidly, and it is increasingly difficult to have energy resources available for export. With the price reform, you will dampen domestic demand, which means more efficient energy use domestically, more energy available for profitable exports, and higher revenues for the country.
a school of thought that believes in motivating the poor to either revolution or docile slavery by making their lives as miserable as humanly possible
that doesn't mean that taking them away is good policy
Neither is leaving them in place. Good policy would be to replace them with something better (less poverty? other energy sources?).
And what share of global fossil fuel subsidies are we talking about here?
But I guess the need to play games on the copper market will make that go even slower. Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se
by gmoke - Nov 7
by gmoke - Nov 6
by gmoke - Oct 27
by Oui - Nov 10
by Oui - Nov 9
by Oui - Nov 8
by Oui - Nov 64 comments
by Oui - Nov 52 comments
by Oui - Nov 4
by Oui - Nov 24 comments
by Oui - Nov 2
by Oui - Nov 14 comments
by Oui - Oct 31
by Oui - Oct 301 comment
by Oui - Oct 2912 comments
by Oui - Oct 28
by Oui - Oct 2711 comments
by Oui - Oct 26