Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
eh.. the thing is, the original, very primitive nuke plants got built in months, not years, and very cheaply per mwh.  Emergency solutions do not look anything like the EPR or the ap1000.

if the alternative is "freezing to death", lead cooled fast breeder designs ripped of soviet sub reactor  designs could be mass produced in factories, and "containment domes" could be redefined to "put it in the cellar". This would not be very sensible, of course, but the laws of physics do actually prevent it. And societies that are in trouble have a very long history of doing things that are not sensible and fixing the problems later.

by Thomas on Wed Nov 10th, 2010 at 04:14:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]
to clarify: I am not advocating this - it is what I think will happen if we fuck up our long term energy supply planning. What I would actually like is an orderly transition to safe and reliable energy sources (EPRs, ap1000s, what hydro we can. desert solar if the price is right) with a long term plan that is more conservative of natural resources than light water reactors (ELSY, Astrid, IFR or whichever design turns out to be most economical)
by Thomas on Wed Nov 10th, 2010 at 04:24:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]
You have now joined the mainstream of American physicists, who never really thought there was another alternative...
by asdf on Thu Nov 11th, 2010 at 08:47:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]
See, for example:

It appears that the future will bring large economic forces to start new orders for nuclear plants.

from "The nuclear power industry in the united states: Status and projections (1988)"

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B75KG-4K9JFYT-5&_user=10&_cover Date=01/31/1988&_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_orig=browse&_origin=browse&_sort=d&view=c &_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=5b91015ea319b1ce754da0 921e72d09e

by asdf on Thu Nov 11th, 2010 at 08:58:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]


Occasional Series