The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
This is an opportunity to reverse the privatization of America's national security infrastructure.
I've heard of privatising profits and socialising losses, but isn't socialising private terrorism going a bit far? Frank's Home Page and Diary Index
Creating the opportunity for private companies to conduct military operations was a huge mistake. Only states should have the right to engage in military operations, allowing for the creation of a market for military services always had the potential to bring down tumbling one of the walls that kept corporate power at bay.
Think about it this way. The UK and France spend about $70 billion each annually on military expenditures. Royal Dutch Shell brought in almost $460 billion last year. If Royal Dutch Shell were allowed to purchase military services on an open market, spending only 15% of its annual revenues would match that, and rocket it past everyone but the United States ($663 billion) and China (~$100 billion).
Do we really want to live in a world where money can buy power like that?
Potentially even more disturbing than the international implications of private military markets, are what happens in the home market.
At what point do the praetorians auction the empire? And I'll give my consent to any government that does not deny a man a living wage-Billy Bragg
No private entity has the right to conduct war.
Yes, but under international law that nice thick line starts to show some wear and tear.
Mercenaries are not accorded the rights of lawful combatants in the Geneva convention, however so long as private military personnel are:
Thus, Blackwater in Iraq was legally an agent of the US government, so that where it employed Ukranians as employees they were lawful combatants (because Ukraine was a party to the conflict), but when they brought in former South African special forces they employed unlawful combatants, because South Africa wasn't party to the conflict.
Murky, eh?
And what happens when the size of the these PMCs armed contingents is larger than the local army? And I'll give my consent to any government that does not deny a man a living wage-Billy Bragg
The answer isn't a world without power, it's one in which power has a social purpose.
Which means combating neoliberal ideology, recapturing governments from the moneyed interests, and using them to create a better world.
If the US and European governments are on the same page about the world that they want than then that is the world that we will have.
It seems to me that the rage for civil society solutions has at least something to do with economic elites control over the machinery of state when the franchise was extended. Because they've lost at the game of political democracy, they think that they can slip the leash by undermining national systems that regulate economies........ And I'll give my consent to any government that does not deny a man a living wage-Billy Bragg
by gmoke - Nov 28
by gmoke - Nov 12 7 comments
by Oui - Dec 1
by gmoke - Nov 301 comment
by Oui - Nov 3010 comments
by Oui - Nov 2837 comments
by Oui - Nov 278 comments
by Oui - Nov 2511 comments
by Oui - Nov 24
by Oui - Nov 221 comment
by Oui - Nov 22
by Oui - Nov 2119 comments
by Oui - Nov 1615 comments
by Oui - Nov 154 comments
by Oui - Nov 1319 comments
by Oui - Nov 1224 comments
by gmoke - Nov 127 comments
by Oui - Nov 1114 comments
by Oui - Nov 10
by Oui - Nov 928 comments
by Oui - Nov 8