Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
IIRC, two Albuquerque hidalgos sailed from Portugal around 1500 and defeated the Mameluke navy, seizing control of the Red Sea and thereby increasing the price of spices which they shipped around Africa.  

"It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Fri Dec 30th, 2011 at 09:17:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]
:) It's fidalgos, not hidalgos.

And it was before Albuquerque. The first vice-king of India was Francisco de Almeida, admiral of the first real military fleet to enter the Indian ocean (note: the guy you call Magellan was part of the marine crops on board). Almeida soon got into conflict with king Manuel, the former preferred a strict maritime dominance strategy while the latter wanted to be the king of the world.

With the message relieving Almeida of his command on the way, his son was captured and killed by the Mameluks (or their allies). After learning that the authors of this act where hiding in Diu, Almeida rushed the fleet there seeking vengeance. At Diu he found an enemy fleet with more than 200 ships belonging to a coalition of 4 states waiting for him. But Almeida didn't vacillate in his revenge and issued an ultimatum: surrender the assassins of his son or prepare for battle. With the ultimatum overdue Almeida plunged his 20 ships into what would be one of the most important naval battles in History.

Soon after Almeida got the message from the king and headed back home. He would never made it back, dying in a wreck in the coast of what is today South Africa.

luis_de_sousa@mastodon.social

by Luis de Sousa (luis[dot]de[dot]sousa[at]protonmail[dot]ch) on Fri Dec 30th, 2011 at 03:47:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]
It appears that both Almeida and Albuquerque were involved. I did know that hidalgos were Spanish, but didn't know the term for the Portuguese equivalents. Thanks and no slight intended. :-)

"It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Fri Dec 30th, 2011 at 03:59:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]
ARGeezer:
It appears that both Almeida and Albuquerque were involved.

But one of them took a left turn... (couldn't resist)

by Bernard (bernard) on Sat Dec 31st, 2011 at 03:53:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Albuquerque took Hormuz alright (twice), but he didn't participate in the battle of Diu. They became adversaries when the king started disfavoring Almeida's purely naval strategy, and at some point Albuquerque was even held imprisoned by Almeida's men. When finally Albuquerque succeeded Almeida he went one to proceed the strategy of controlling all checkpoints connecting the Indian to the Atlantic and the Mediterranean.

But it was the battle of Diu that opened the gates to the watershed of globalization. I was a huge display of technological power and a geo-political turn of events with little parallel in history.  

luis_de_sousa@mastodon.social

by Luis de Sousa (luis[dot]de[dot]sousa[at]protonmail[dot]ch) on Sat Dec 31st, 2011 at 05:57:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series