The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
It shouldn't do so just to please the money markets, though. It should do it (or not do it) if and when it makes social and economic sense. The money markets need to be taught that they are servants, not masters, to the state.
- Jake Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.
The money markets need to be taught that they are servants, not masters, to the state.
Can't imagine what kind of economic calculation will make it make sense.
Denmark, for instance, has a lot of public land that is public because far-sighted infrastructure planning 50 to 100 years ago left us with a number of rail and road corridors for future use. Usually a number of different routes are available to cover the same connection, so once a route is decided upon, it frees up public land that there is no longer any particularly compelling reason to hang on to (and private land is freed from codes prohibiting development, as well as the risk of having it seized for a transit corridor).
Selling public land or businesses just to sell - or to absorb private fiat currency savings - is silly, of course. Selling in order to release land that the public has no interesting use for... not so much.
by gmoke - Jun 10
by Frank Schnittger - May 31
by Oui - May 30 50 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 23 3 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 27 3 comments
by Oui - May 13 66 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 10
by Oui - Jun 91 comment
by Oui - Jun 58 comments
by Oui - Jun 257 comments
by Oui - Jun 112 comments
by Oui - May 31121 comments
by Oui - May 3050 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 273 comments
by Oui - May 2742 comments
by Oui - May 24
by Frank Schnittger - May 233 comments
by Oui - May 1366 comments
by Oui - May 928 comments
by Oui - May 450 comments
by Oui - Apr 30273 comments
by Oui - Apr 2666 comments
by Oui - Apr 8108 comments
by Oui - Mar 19145 comments