The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
You pay the expenses and taxes through a consumer loan, not a mortgage.
Economics is politics by other means
Think about a negative-amortisation loan as an interest-only loan plus some fictional interest. This extra interest increases the bank's assets but not its liabilities, compared to an interest-only loan at a correspondingly lower interest. It's free funny-money for the bank, in that it comes with no funding cost - no extra liabilities means no need to borrow more from the CB.
Taxes don't work like that, because they have to be paid in real money, not Monopoly money. So a consumer loan to pay taxes actually increases the bank's liabilities, making it less attractive on paper.
(That, and mortgages typically come with stickier strings attached than consumer loans.)
Of course there are no regulations that a sufficiently incompetent or corrupt regulator cannot fuck up. Foolproof systems do not exist in economics, and even if they did nature is ever at work improving the stock of fools. But as a first line of defence, property taxes are not bad.
Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 3 21 comments
by eurogreen - Jun 28 24 comments
by gmoke - Jun 28
by Oui - Jul 5 7 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 27 1 comment
by Oui - Jun 25 12 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 16 10 comments
by Oui - Jun 17 64 comments
by Oui - Jul 57 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 321 comments
by gmoke - Jun 29
by eurogreen - Jun 2824 comments
by gmoke - Jun 28
by Oui - Jun 2714 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 271 comment
by Oui - Jun 2512 comments
by Oui - Jun 1764 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 1610 comments
by Oui - Jun 158 comments
by Oui - Jun 1210 comments
by Oui - Jun 89 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 79 comments
by Oui - Jun 777 comments
by Oui - May 29164 comments
by Oui - May 22129 comments