Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
As I posted here, there may be a play between different groups of banks:

it's worth noting that once you account for the substantial payouts that US agents will have to make to European creditors in the case of a default by one of the PIGs, financial institutions in the US have roughly as much to lose from default as those in France and Germany. (See the figures in blue in the table above.) The apparent eagerness of US banks and insurance companies to sell default insurance to European creditors means that they will now have to substantially share in the pain inflicted by a PIG default.


First, US and European financial institutions are likely to have very different incentives as negotiations regarding debt restructuring and reprofiling proceed. US banks and insurance companies are surely delighted with the " soft restructuring" that is currently being discussed. Such a partial default would probably not trigger default insurance payments, and so the pain would be borne almost exclusively by European institutions. On the other hand, some time soon it seems likely that European creditors will begin to prefer a "hard restructuring" that would require default insurance payouts from the US institutions that sold such insurance. Given how strikingly one-sided the net default insurance payments will be (from the US to Europe), it's easy to imagine how that could shape future negotiations over debt relief for the PIGs.

It's a bit strange to see the French government apparently protecting the Us banks - unless they know something about French banks having sold CDSs as well which are not reflected in BIS data?

Wind power

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Mon Jun 13th, 2011 at 08:03:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Just 120 Bil? Peanuts no (at a global scale)? For all the talk, I was expecting Armageddon numbers...
by cagatacos on Mon Jun 13th, 2011 at 09:14:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]


Occasional Series