The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Here is some things I noted:
Data, offshore (p.22)
Evidence on the performance of Danish oﬀshore installations is both restricted and so poor
that there may be concern that the results are aﬀected by a small number of outliers. Still, the
sample contains a reasonable number of sites with at least 5 years of operating experience and
the decline in performance by age 5 is 38% unweighted and 26% capacity weighted.
So with more data another picture might emerge for offshore with the same analysis. I also note that on my quick read-through I haven't got a firm grasp on where exactly his data comes from.
While the decline in the achieved performance of onshore wind turbines in Denmark is
much less than that for the UK or oﬀshore, nonetheless the decline in expected output under
standardised wind conditions over 10 years is 10% unweighted and 13% capacity weighted.
These declines accelerate aﬅer age 10 so that the reductions in performance are 17% and 20%
respectively aﬅer 15 years. For UK onshore wind farms the reduction in performance due to
age is much worse at 27% unweighted and 69% capacity weighted by age 10.
Now, all machines age and I don't know expected lifetimes and such, so I don't know what one should expect. What I do find dramatic here is the difference between Denmark and UK. That does not look like a mature technology aging to me. So what is wrong with UK onshore wind?
Going through the model is kind of heavy lifting on the day before christmas, but if you need to hire in your agit-prop division you know where to reach me.
Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se
Interesting that the Danish data is "restricted and poor" compared to the UK data, but the Danish data comes in a Zip file that is reported as 18Mb in size, whereas the UK data is only 3Mb now all other things being equal you'd expect the "restricted and poor " data to come out smaller than the good set, not six times the size. That thegood data is then split down into 4 seperate reporting countries only makes me more suspicious.
Any idiot can face a crisis - it's day to day living that wears you out.
Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.
by Oui - Dec 9 7 comments
by Oui - Dec 5 10 comments
by gmoke - Nov 28
by Oui - Dec 99 comments
by Oui - Dec 97 comments
by Oui - Dec 820 comments
by Oui - Dec 621 comments
by Oui - Dec 612 comments
by Oui - Dec 510 comments
by Oui - Dec 44 comments
by Oui - Dec 27 comments
by Oui - Dec 190 comments
by Oui - Dec 16 comments
by gmoke - Nov 303 comments
by Oui - Nov 3012 comments
by gmoke - Nov 28
by Oui - Nov 2838 comments
by Oui - Nov 2713 comments
by Oui - Nov 2511 comments
by Oui - Nov 243 comments
by Oui - Nov 221 comment
by Oui - Nov 22
by Oui - Nov 2119 comments