Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
A further idea is to stop using natural gas for heating, cooking and power generation. But deregulation of gas and power does the opposite.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
by Starvid on Fri Feb 3rd, 2012 at 07:17:25 PM EST
heating is a much better use for gas than generating electricity. And cooking is the noblest of all uses. I expect that when gas has become rare and expensive, people will be prepared to pay a premium to cook with it, just as i will be happy to buy diesel for my camper van in 20 years, at whatever the price is.

It is rightly acknowledged that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue - Queen Elizabeth II
by eurogreen on Sun Feb 5th, 2012 at 12:10:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]
1 kWh of nat gas burned for heating equals 1 kWh of heat. The same amount of gas burnt in a combined cycle turbine gives you 0.4 kWh of power, which when feed into a heat pump gives you about 1.5 kWh of heat. Burning gas for heat is just such a waste of a noble commodity.

If I made the laws, gas wouldn't even be burnt for power, but would be used exclusively as a motor fuel and chemical feedstock.


Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.

by Starvid on Sun Feb 5th, 2012 at 01:18:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I've been looking through IEA numbers for electricity generation. It's always suprising to see how much natural gas, and petroleum, is used to make electricity in big oil exporters.

Oil-fired electricity seems to be an even greater waste than gas fired production.  At the very least in economic terms.  

It seems to me that a program to introduce windpower in bulk to these countries would free an enormous amount for oil for the world market. Venezuela has made moves towards this, but I'm not sure that there has been a lot of effort in other countries.

Venezuela burned through the equivalent of 26,000 barrels of oil equivalent a day to produce electricity in 2009. Think of it this way.  A single 3 MW wind turbine operating at 35% capacity saves the equivalent of over 5600 barrels a day if replacing oil-fired production. A 1GW wind farm would save the equivalent of 5,000 barrels a day. Driving out oil-fired production, on an annual basis, would require just over 1730 3 MW turbines. Coupled with hydro in the country, you could free a lot of oil for export.

And I'll give my consent to any government that does not deny a man a living wage-Billy Bragg

by ManfromMiddletown (manfrommiddletown at lycos dot com) on Mon Feb 6th, 2012 at 10:04:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I imagine this only happens in places where there are massive government subsidies on oil as oil-fired power plants are extremely unprofitable in the baseload role.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
by Starvid on Mon Feb 6th, 2012 at 11:07:51 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I can't say for certain, but my understanding is that oil is used for peaking while hydro and gas fills the baseload role in most of Latin America.

Hmm.   Maybe a diary with the figures would do some good. I've not been good about diarying lately. Preoccupied with writing for school and the job search.

BTW if anyone knows of a job search site for academic positions in Europe, I'd appreciate it.  

And I'll give my consent to any government that does not deny a man a living wage-Billy Bragg

by ManfromMiddletown (manfrommiddletown at lycos dot com) on Mon Feb 6th, 2012 at 12:27:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]
For Germany, there's the Ausschreibungsdienst of the Hochschulverband, but I'm not sure if you can get the listings for free.
by gk (gk (gk quattro due due sette @gmail.com)) on Mon Feb 6th, 2012 at 12:34:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Or they could also try a Nuclear Energy programme. If NATO agrees, that is.

luis_de_sousa@mastodon.social
by Luis de Sousa (luis[dot]de[dot]sousa[at]protonmail[dot]ch) on Tue Feb 7th, 2012 at 04:29:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series