Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
The new post-Panamax standard seems to be having a significant effect throughout the shipping industry: New bigger coal ships, harbor dredging in NYC, New Jersey, and Charleston, port realignments in the Baltic, new ship maintenance infrastructure in Poland...
by asdf on Sun Apr 22nd, 2012 at 06:53:36 PM EST
Yes, it has ripple effects even beyond the Panama Canal shipping lanes, since a large segment of the merchant marine fleet is designed to be able to go through the Panama Canal, which makes Panamax a natural alternative to include in all sorts of port/harbor/channel design decisions.

Where Capesize has not had any single specific maximum dimensions, New Panamax is a similar ship dimension envelope to include as a design alternative.

Obviously, some shipping routes see Panamax vessels because that's a good fit to the freight markets served, and those are not going to switch to New Panamax just for bragging rights ... but where a route has seen Panamax vessels because of channel / harbour / port infrastructure sized to accommodate Panamax, then if some of those are raised to New Panamax in pursuit of other business, there may be lobbying to raise all size bottlenecks along that non-Capesize route to New Panamax dimensions.

I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Mon Apr 23rd, 2012 at 10:49:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]


Top Diaries

Occasional Series