The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Minister for Finance Michael Noonan has today warned he will have to introduce a tougher budget that will include tax increases if the public rejects the Fiscal Treaty Referendum.Speaking on his way into a Cabinet meeting this morning, Mr Noonan rejected suggestions that the country would still be able to access funding if a No vote is returned by the electorate."It's very clear on this treaty that only those countries that ratify it will have access to European Stability Mechanism (ESM) funding and there are no other funds," he said."If there's a No vote the Budget I'll be planning for later in the year will be dramatically more difficult than if there's a Yes vote."If people think that by voting No they'll avoid further tax cuts and increases, actually a No vote will do the opposite," he added.Fianna Fáil described Mr Noonan's comments as "unhelpful" and said they would only serve to alienate potential Yes voters.
Speaking on his way into a Cabinet meeting this morning, Mr Noonan rejected suggestions that the country would still be able to access funding if a No vote is returned by the electorate.
"It's very clear on this treaty that only those countries that ratify it will have access to European Stability Mechanism (ESM) funding and there are no other funds," he said.
"If there's a No vote the Budget I'll be planning for later in the year will be dramatically more difficult than if there's a Yes vote.
"If people think that by voting No they'll avoid further tax cuts and increases, actually a No vote will do the opposite," he added.
Fianna Fáil described Mr Noonan's comments as "unhelpful" and said they would only serve to alienate potential Yes voters.
The problem is not that there is no mechanism for stimulating the Irish economy in the event of a no vote and a default (or similar) on Anglo Irish promissory notes etc. - the problem is that the national elite have absolutely no idea how this might be done. Index of Frank's Diaries
At the moment the Irish economy is bouncing along the bottom with c. 0.7% growth, stable unemployment, significant emigration and some good news job announcements. Most small mall businesses and consumers are just about hanging in there. If there is a significant further downturn then all bets are off. Just now people are still clinging to the life rafts and a belief that we may still get out of this alive. Index of Frank's Diaries
Of course, that is a violation of the EU treaties since they give the ECB the monopoly of legal tender. More imaginative ways around it must be sought. guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper
More imaginative ways around it must be sought.
You should not make obviously incredible threats or promises. It gains you nothing and makes people more likely to call upon you to make good on future threats and promises, which is almost always expensive.
- Jake Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.
The former is trivial, the latter is impossible.
For that matter, I'm not totally convinced that the powers that be want the Court to be looking too closely at their - uh - creative interpretation of the treaties.
I guess in the final extremity, you could always get a few pictures of the outgoing central banker with his favourite hooker and resign him instead of firing him.
The Cypriot central banker reshuffle does not seem to have been challenged in the Court.
I thought - but have no other source then the wording - that the term was up. If I remember EMU rules correctly its a six year term and appointment is by the parliament-appointed CB board. Firing a CB board member during the term can be challenged in national court and firing the boss can be challenged in the Court. Can't find a source right now.
JakeS:
Yes, firing for subverting EMU treaties with respect to other goals then price stability and using ECB to subvert other EU-treaties, would make a court hearing an interesting spectacle. Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se
One possibility would be to carefully 'privatize' the process of the creation and administration of the Punt. Then they could plead respect for private property. :-) "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
And if not, then they need to hang on to their strategic hard currency reserve, not expend it on frivolous things like pleasing foreign creditors.
While no details were spelled out, I expect that it would be necessary to require all cross border transactions to be conducted through the Irish CB. This is what worked in China, however the Argentine experience might suggest other options. I don't know. "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
Now, for a normal country, that would mean that after repudiating sufficient amounts of foreign debt, it would have a current accounts surplus. But Ireland is not a normal country, because the difference between trade balance and current accounts balance is driven by expatriation of profits rather than expatriation of interest payments (as is usually the case).
That means they can't default and peg the New Punt to the , because they can't defend that peg.
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 24 2 comments
by Oui - Sep 19 19 comments
by Oui - Sep 13 35 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 11 5 comments
by Cat - Sep 13 9 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 2 2 comments
by Oui - Sep 29
by Oui - Sep 28
by Oui - Sep 274 comments
by Oui - Sep 2618 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 242 comments
by Oui - Sep 1919 comments
by gmoke - Sep 173 comments
by Oui - Sep 153 comments
by Oui - Sep 15
by Oui - Sep 1411 comments
by Oui - Sep 1335 comments
by Cat - Sep 139 comments
by Oui - Sep 127 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 115 comments
by Oui - Sep 929 comments
by Oui - Sep 713 comments
by Oui - Sep 61 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 22 comments
by gmoke - Sep 2
by Oui - Sep 1199 comments