Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
Yes, that is an extremely relevant distinction. A common market with fixed exchange rates will end up with the countries who are least willing to accept inflation as structural surplus countries, while a a common market with floating exchange rates will end up with balanced foreign accounts or, at worst, the countries most willing to accept inflation as structural surplus countries.

In the European picture, the latter is a much healthier construction, because the pro-inflation states lack the political power - both individually and collectively - to collect on such surpluses. And if the diary's central thesis (that anti-inflation inanity is a luxury made possible by political and industrial power) is correct, then this result will generalise.

- Jake

Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Mon Apr 9th, 2012 at 10:09:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Yup. But the ill will caused by the failure of the single currency will probably render the survival of the common market politically difficult in the short to medium term.

If we do not throw out the water soon, the baby will go with it.

by cagatacos on Mon Apr 9th, 2012 at 10:25:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Given that the historically dominant failure mode of gold standard economics is fascism, I guess I can live with losing the single market if that is all we lose.

- Jake

Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Mon Apr 9th, 2012 at 10:28:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I doubt that the single market is all that is lost.  Remember that the European project began as an economic solution to a political problem.  The integration of European coal and steel markets was to make war unthinkable between European states.

Moreover, intra-EU trade is as often in components as in finished products.  Supply chains cross national boundaries.  Restablish border controls and tarriffs and you wreak havoc on the whole economy built upon the assumption of open borders.

And I'll give my consent to any government that does not deny a man a living wage-Billy Bragg

by ManfromMiddletown (manfrommiddletown at lycos dot com) on Mon Apr 9th, 2012 at 02:23:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The integration of European coal and steel markets was to make war unthinkable between European states.

True, and from a German perspective the current arrangements make war, already see as wasteful, now totally unnecessary. They have preferential access to and economic dominance over the bulk of the continent and they have a de facto veto over any political challenges from other countries as their second line of defense, the first line of defense being the intellectual capture which includes the vast preponderance of the elites of the member states of the EMU. And few can see any fingerprints indicating how this came to be.

"It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Mon Apr 9th, 2012 at 04:10:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The question is whether the rollback would be chronological or not. One could roll back to the Single European Act plus Schengen and then what would be lost would be the layer of political integration since 1990, and none of the economic integration.
With hindsight, everything since the Single European Act was a bridge too far, politically. The Common Foreign and Security Policy and Cooperation in Criminal Justice never quite took off, the Euro is imploding under the weight of unrestrained internal trade imbalances, and Schengen is in the process of being rolled back.
(September 21, 2011)

Alternatively, the political layer could be retained and the economic union jettisoned. This would keep the useless Common Foreign and Security Policy, the Cooperation in Criminal Justice (including the European Arrest Warrant), the undermining of "the Community method" in favour of the "Intergovernmental Method"... But this is highly unlikely because the economic integration is deeper.

None of this will happen, the most likely scenario is the creation of a new layer of Kommissars (ECB President, EuroGroup Chairman, Council President, EFSF/ESM Chairman, Trichet's award-winning budget-dog-in-the-manger czar...) to the detriment of the "Community Method", a disempowerment of the European Parliament, more police cooperation to clamp down on popular discontent, a beefed-up Bolkestein directive to usher in an EU-wide labour race to the bottom, and the general penury that Merkel has promised us "for decades". I even foresee Merkel being Chancellor for 16 years (until at least 2020).

There are three stories about the euro crisis: the Republican story, the German story, and the truth. -- Paul Krugman

by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Apr 10th, 2012 at 04:53:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]
In the immortal words of Jean Claude Juncker: "the Euro will outlast us all".

There are three stories about the euro crisis: the Republican story, the German story, and the truth. -- Paul Krugman
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Mon Apr 9th, 2012 at 10:29:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series