The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
If it wasn't for the bloody nazis this is as close to perfect as I can imagine. Check out the interior ministry results. Their prognostication with 50% of results in, is currently
ND - 19,2 - 109 seats SYRIZA 16,3 - 50 PASOK 13,6 42 AnEl 10,5 - 32 KKE 8,5 26 Nazis 7,0 22 Dem Ar 6,0 19
The Greens and Laos will be close to the 3% limit and possibly over (and thus seats will change), Dem Alliance will be close to 3% and possibly under... LAOS is a possible two-party system ally
I'll be back later. Off to celebrate! The road of excess leads to the palace of wisdom - William Blake
- Jake Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.
Maybe a lesson here for Ireland too.
That's called "begging the question," and is generally frowned upon outside certain Jesuit orders.
My guess is that you'd be looking at a clear pro-Troika majority government or a much bigger nazi party. And that's an inclusive "or."
And if they had followed that advice, would they have been able to contest this election effectively?
The party apparatus required to run an effective election campaign does not spring into existence the moment a window of opportunity appears. It must be built in the years before that opportunity appears, which means it must be built during election cycles where running "spoiler" candidates carries short-term costs.
Since one is usually not in possession of such knowledge of the future, the general rule I propose is that one must have a plausible strategy for either building a third party or influencing the existing major parties depending on circumstance. And in particular the strategy of "let them know our displeasure by making a protest vote or not voting" is one that has been shown to not work.
If your reasoning was valid in Spain in 2011, why was it not valid in Greece in 2009? Conversely, if it was invalid in Greece in 2009, why was it valid in Spain in 2011?
Which is, incidentally, around four times what Syriza got in 2009.
Unless we're misunderstanding your ideas about strategic voting. guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper
Voting for SNP or even De Linke is very different from voting for Ralph Nader in the US or for a splinter party in most of Spain. I'm not against that at all. In fact, even in the US, there are places where third parties can and are effective. New York's Working Family Party is quite interesting. If you have a third party that is in position to win seats - why not? My point was that the "plague on both houses" argument in favor of either sitting it out or voting symbolically, is a common argument. No Les Votes reads a lot like Michael Moore. I don't think it's a coincidence.
ND - 19.80 - 111 seats SYRIZA 16.25 - 50 PASOK 13.64 42 AnEl 10.50 - 32 KKE 8.37 - 26 Nazis 6.88 - 21 Dem Ar 6.04 - 18 LAOS 2.86 - 0 Greens 2.86 - 0
Are there counting trends in Greece like cities reporting last? Something that could yet boost the Greens? *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 17
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 10 3 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 1 6 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 3 32 comments
by Oui - Sep 6 3 comments
by Oui - Sep 195 comments
by Oui - Sep 19
by Oui - Sep 18
by Oui - Sep 1727 comments
by Oui - Sep 154 comments
by Oui - Sep 151 comment
by Oui - Sep 1315 comments
by Oui - Sep 13
by Oui - Sep 124 comments
by Oui - Sep 1010 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 103 comments
by Oui - Sep 10
by Oui - Sep 92 comments
by Oui - Sep 84 comments
by Oui - Sep 715 comments
by Oui - Sep 72 comments
by Oui - Sep 63 comments